Hi,
I believe Gimp it's Plugins may be compared to
Firefox it's Extensions (although it's maybe not
implemented identically).
And theres something I love with Firefox and it's
extensions : the update system.
So I was thinking : why not have such update system
for the Gimp ? It would be really
Carol Spears wrote:
On Thu, May 26, 2005 at 04:32:37PM +0200, Pierre-Alexis wrote:
I believe Gimp it's Plugins may be compared to
Firefox it's Extensions (although it's maybe not
implemented identically).
interesting.
could you expand on the comparison for me? i do not see any
yeah, i think that's gonna be great! though my prob is that
i'm no developer. and that im sorry that i can't contribute
plugins, brushes, patterns, and stuff. though i am pro to your
decision. the only question is... who does all the updating
and server paying? i dont think we can make GIMP pay
On Thursday 26 May 2005 01:16 pm, Carol Spears wrote:
On Thu, May 26, 2005 at 07:50:31PM +0300, Erika De Jesus wrote:
Carol Spears wrote:
could you expand on the comparison for me? i do not see any
similarities and i am interested to see what similarities you see
between the two
On Thu, May 26, 2005 at 07:50:31PM +0300, Erika De Jesus wrote:
Carol Spears wrote:
interesting.
could you expand on the comparison for me? i do not see any
similarities and i am interested to see what similarities you see
between the two separately licensed, separately funded softwares
On Thu, May 26, 2005 at 02:23:23PM -0400, BandiPat wrote:
I'll try to clarify Pierre's Erika's points, if I'm reading them
correctly. You have obviously gone off in a different direction than I
think either of them were heading, but you also make some good points.
Is that being
Erika De Jesus wrote:
yeah, i think that's gonna be great! though my prob is that
i'm no developer. and that im sorry that i can't contribute
plugins, brushes, patterns, and stuff. though i am pro to your
decision. the only question is... who does all the updating
and server paying? i dont
Have someone make a depositry of plugins
http://registry.gimp.org
It isn't as easy to use as the Mozilla plugin system but I wanted to make
sure you were aware of it.
Sincerely
Alan Horkan
http://advogato.org/person/AlanHorkan/
___
Gimp-user
On Thursday 26 May 2005 04:07 pm, Alan Horkan wrote:
Have someone make a depositry of plugins
http://registry.gimp.org
It isn't as easy to use as the Mozilla plugin system but I wanted to
make sure you were aware of it.
Sincerely
Alan Horkan
http://advogato.org/person/AlanHorkan/
On Thursday 26 May 2005 03:36 pm, Carol Spears wrote:
On Thu, May 26, 2005 at 02:23:23PM -0400, BandiPat wrote:
I'll try to clarify Pierre's Erika's points, if I'm reading them
correctly. You have obviously gone off in a different direction
than I think either of them were heading, but
On Thu, May 26, 2005 at 04:32:37PM +0200, Pierre-Alexis wrote:
Hi,
I believe Gimp it's Plugins may be compared to
Firefox it's Extensions (although it's maybe not
implemented identically).
And theres something I love with Firefox and it's
extensions : the update system.
This has been
Hi,
BandiPat [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Now I'm not sure if the Gimp folks check all the plugins out before
making them available or adding them, but it would seem logical to me
for them to have control over that, so no harmful plugins would be
submitted. Have a contributor send the
Carol Spears wrote:
On Thu, May 26, 2005 at 07:50:31PM +0300, Erika De Jesus wrote:
Carol Spears wrote:
interesting.
could you expand on the comparison for me? i do not see any
similarities and i am interested to see what similarities you see
between the two separately licensed,
13 matches
Mail list logo
