[Gimp-user] OT GTK/SuSE/Gimp question

2005-06-04 Thread Eric P
This is probably way off topic for this ML (so please ignore if you 
want), but it started w/the Gimp, so what hell...


I compiled new versions of atk/glib2/gtk2/pango in order to start 
checking out the 2.3 series of the Gimp.


Everything went fine.  I removed the old atk/glib2/gtk2/pango RPMs along 
w/their respected devel RPMs.  I then make installed (via checkinstall) 
all the new GTK and friends, so I now have lovely round RPMs of each 
package installed.  Now I compiled Gimp 2.3.0, and, yet again, all went 
well.


However, when I run YAST now, it insists on reinstalling the old GTK 
(and friends) devel RPMs.  Of course, I don't want to do that as the new 
header files are already installed.  The RPMs I created (with 
checkinstall) contain the header files.  The RPM packages just weren't 
broken out into 2 RPMs per package (i.e., binary RPM and devel RPM) like 
SuSE and other distros tend to do.


Any tips on this dilemma?

Thanks for reading,
Eric P

Ps. I'm running SuSE 9.2 pro
___
Gimp-user mailing list
Gimp-user@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


Re: [Gimp-user] OT GTK/SuSE/Gimp question

2005-06-04 Thread BandiPat
On Saturday 04 June 2005 11:44 am, Eric P wrote:
 This is probably way off topic for this ML (so please ignore if you
 want), but it started w/the Gimp, so what hell...

 I compiled new versions of atk/glib2/gtk2/pango in order to start
 checking out the 2.3 series of the Gimp.

 Everything went fine.  I removed the old atk/glib2/gtk2/pango RPMs
 along w/their respected devel RPMs.  I then make installed (via
 checkinstall) all the new GTK and friends, so I now have lovely round
 RPMs of each package installed.  Now I compiled Gimp 2.3.0, and, yet
 again, all went well.

 However, when I run YAST now, it insists on reinstalling the old GTK
 (and friends) devel RPMs.  Of course, I don't want to do that as the
 new header files are already installed.  The RPMs I created (with
 checkinstall) contain the header files.  The RPM packages just
 weren't broken out into 2 RPMs per package (i.e., binary RPM and
 devel RPM) like SuSE and other distros tend to do.

 Any tips on this dilemma?

 Thanks for reading,
 Eric P

 Ps. I'm running SuSE 9.2 pro
=

Eric,
Did you get any conflicts or dependencies when trying to install the new 
rpms?  I would guess you have a mismatch of sorts and that is why YaST2 
wants to put things right.  You can go into YaST2 software module and 
select those files you installed to set them as protected, so YaST2 
doesn't complain continually.  If you have been running YOU to stay 
updated, your glib2 files  pango files should be adequate to run Gimp 
newer versions, mine is.  I don't have any trouble compiling the newer 
Gimp builds either.  Here are presently installed 9.2 versions:
glib2-devel-2.6.3-9
glib2-2.6.3-9
glib2-doc-2.6.3-9

pango-devel-1.4.1-3
pango-1.4.1-3
pango-doc-1.4.1-3

regards,
Patrick

-- 
--- KMail v1.8 --- SuSE Linux Pro v9.2 ---
  Registered Linux User #225206
There's no problem so awful that you can't
add some guilt to it and make it even worse!  ...Calvin  Hobbes
___
Gimp-user mailing list
Gimp-user@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user