Hi,
Daniel Rogers [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hopefully it won't be that long to a next stable release of gimp.
It would be nice to see it in 2004 (albeit late 2004).
I have been asked to point out that is is my opinion and noone has
made any specific plans.
We did indeed make very
2.2 is going to have the same core as 2.0, isn't it?
Sven Neumann wrote:
We did indeed make very specific plans for the time after the 2.0
release and decided that we are targetting a GIMP-2.2 release about
six months after 2.0.0 hits the streets.
--
With respect
Alexander Rabtchevich
Hi,
Alexander Rabtchevich [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
2.2 is going to have the same core as 2.0, isn't it?
Not necessarily. We will try to prepare the core for GEGL and perhaps
even start to use it in a few places. With 2.0 we have come quite far
with our code cleanup and it's about time to
Hi,
Daniel Rogers wrote:
Hopefully it won't be that long to a next stable release of gimp. It
would be nice to see it in 2004 (albeit late 2004).
I have been asked to point out that is is my opinion and noone has made
any specific plans. (From talking with other open source projects,
Daniel Rogers wrote:
Hopefully it won't be that long to a next stable release of gimp. It
would be nice to see it in 2004 (albeit late 2004).
I have been asked to point out that is is my opinion and noone has made
any specific plans. (From talking with other open source projects, 9-12
month
