[Gimp-user] Re: [Gimp-developer] gegl query
Hi, Daniel Rogers wrote: > >Hopefully it won't be that long to a next stable release of gimp. It > >would be nice to see it in 2004 (albeit late 2004). > > I have been asked to point out that is is my opinion and noone has made > any specific plans. (From talking with other open source projects, 9-12 > month release cycles keep interest high). It's my opinion too. It's also the general plan that was discussed at the GIMP conference in Berlin. I'd personally like to aim for a 6 month stable release turnaround, similar to GNOME. At least for 2.2. Of course, this is just my opinion Cheers, Dave. -- David Neary, Lyon, France E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [Gimp-user] Re: [Gimp-developer] gegl query
Hi, Alexander Rabtchevich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > 2.2 is going to have the same core as 2.0, isn't it? Not necessarily. We will try to prepare the core for GEGL and perhaps even start to use it in a few places. With 2.0 we have come quite far with our code cleanup and it's about time to tackle some of the more basic functions. So I don't expect the 2.2 core to be identical to the 2.0 core. I doubt however that a user will notice the difference. Sven ___ Gimp-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Re: [Gimp-user] Re: [Gimp-developer] gegl query
2.2 is going to have the same core as 2.0, isn't it? Sven Neumann wrote: We did indeed make very specific plans for the time after the 2.0 release and decided that we are targetting a GIMP-2.2 release about six months after 2.0.0 hits the streets. -- With respect Alexander Rabtchevich ___ Gimp-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Re: [Gimp-user] Re: [Gimp-developer] gegl query
Hi, Daniel Rogers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Hopefully it won't be that long to a next stable release of gimp. > > It would be nice to see it in 2004 (albeit late 2004). > > I have been asked to point out that is is my opinion and noone has > made any specific plans. We did indeed make very specific plans for the time after the 2.0 release and decided that we are targetting a GIMP-2.2 release about six months after 2.0.0 hits the streets. Sven ___ Gimp-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
[Gimp-user] Re: [Gimp-developer] gegl query
Daniel Rogers wrote: Hopefully it won't be that long to a next stable release of gimp. It would be nice to see it in 2004 (albeit late 2004). I have been asked to point out that is is my opinion and noone has made any specific plans. (From talking with other open source projects, 9-12 month release cycles keep interest high). -- Daniel pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
