[Gimp-user] Re: smart resize

2004-10-25 Thread GSR - FR
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (2004-10-15 at 0609.12 +): The question is tricky. And I'm very interested in a clear answer. My opinion is that (sometimes) bicubic for reducing smooths the image too much. I found this off comp.periphs.scanners:

Re: [Gimp-user] Re: smart resize

2004-10-25 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, GSR - FR [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Another similar pages talking about filtering (demo and/or code) just in case someone wants to get deeper: http://www.binbooks.com/books/photo/i/l/57186AF8DE http://www.antigrain.com/

[Gimp-user] Re: smart resize

2004-10-15 Thread Pasi Savolainen
* Marco [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Barton Bosch wrote: Hey Marco, could you tell whether and why using bicubic for enlarging and bilinear for reducing is better than using bicubic for both? I was under the impression that bicubic was the highest quality algorithm for all resizing operations.