Alchemie Foto\grafiche

--- Lun 20/10/08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto:
Da: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Oggetto: Gimp-user Digest, Vol 73, Issue 41
A: gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
Data: Lunedì 20 ottobre 2008, 06:12

Send Gimp-user mailing list submissions to
        gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
        https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
        [EMAIL PROTECTED]

You can reach the person managing the list at
        [EMAIL PROTECTED]

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Gimp-user digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. Re: Changing events (Daniel Hornung)
   2. Re: export and save as gif dialogs ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
   3. Re: Searching GIMP user manual (Sven Neumann)
   4. Re: script-fu-save-anim-layers (Alec Burgess)
   5. Re: export and save as gif dialogs
      ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
   6. Re: ftp address for 2.6.1 rpm (Rick)
   7. rectangular selection (presyesc)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2008 23:35:09 +0200
From: Daniel Hornung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [Gimp-user] Changing events
To: gimp-user@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

On Sunday 19 October 2008, Johan Vromans wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a couple of databases where I entered the date that people were
> christened instead of date of birth, the latter being unknown.
> However, The Narrative Web Report seems to use the event Baptism
> instead of Christening.
>
> Is there an easy way to change Christening to Baptism for all entries
> in the database?
>
> I tried to export GRAMPS XML, issue a search/replace on the text and
> then re-import the XML. This seems to work but can I be sure no
> information gets lost this way?
>
> -- Johan

Hi, 
you're probably writing to the wrong mailing list?

Daniel
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : /lists/gimp-user/attachments/20081019/81c93270/attachment-0001.bin 

------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2008 23:46:35 +0200
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Gimp-user] export and save as gif dialogs
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED],
        gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

> #1. Is it possible to have the outputted filename derived from the  
> original image's filename? For example, if you are selecting from an  
> image named "somegirl.gif" then could the script assume that the
 
> output filename should be named "somegirl-cutout.gif"?

No. Picture 2 is derived from the page number  where it is,
for example the first image on page 3248 of picture 100.gif is called 
32481.gif, picture2 32482.gif, etc...
page number is contained by the original picture, and has nothing to do
with it's name. Original picture is called  in the example 100.gif, and the

derived pictures are called 32481.gif,  32482.gif and 32491.gif
To find the proper name is job for a human, the machine
can not effectively help there.

> #2. Is it necessary to create a new image from the copied region? And  
> even if it is (e.g., you want to edit the pasted image), would it be  
> acceptable if the script performed the creation of this image. I.e.,  
> you make your selection and then run the script -- the new image is  
> opened (if necessary) and then saved as a GIF.

The script is unable to create the images. They must be created manually.
They are pictures in written text, and only a human can decide,
which parts are images and which parts are text. The selected
part then usually gets modified in size and also sometimes rotated.
All jobs, only a human can do properly.
I checked with the most up-to-date ocr programs, they do a lousy
job when they try to find out, which parts are pictures and
which are text. They err in 20-30% of the cases, which 
is completely unacceptable and unusable for me.

> Of course, doing precisely what you described is possible; it just  
> entails some steps that might better be automated.

That exactly would speed up my work by at least 20-30%.

Thanks, eleonora

-- 
GMX startet ShortView.de. Hier findest Du Leute mit Deinen Interessen!
Jetzt dabei sein: http://www.shortview.de/[EMAIL PROTECTED]


------------------------------

Message: 3
Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2008 23:56:02 +0200
From: Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [Gimp-user] Searching GIMP user manual
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: gimp-user@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain

Hi,

On Sun, 2008-10-19 at 22:51 +0200, Daniel Hornung wrote:

> The articles are well linked between each other, but that's a tedious
way of 
> finding the relevant piece of information.  Probably it's not a real
search 
> that's needed but a link to the index, so here it is (to the original 
> poster):
> 
> http://docs.gimp.org/en/gimp-help-index.html

Well, the index is always just one click away in the help-browser. And
in the new help-browser the index is even present all the time in the
side-pane on the left side.


Sven




------------------------------

Message: 4
Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2008 18:06:57 -0400
From: Alec Burgess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [Gimp-user] script-fu-save-anim-layers
To: Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

Alec Burgess wrote:
> Since we've had all these messages about this ... I thought I'd
ask:
>
> Shouldn't the so-called fix I made, adding a dummy variable with a 
> value but leaving the remaining two variables (image) and (buffer) 
> uninitialized still have been a syntax error? I was  surprised that it 
> in fact actually made the script work.
>
> Kevin Cozens wrote:
>> Alec Burgess wrote:
>>   
>>> Thanks ... I think :-) found the example and perused the linked
PDF 
>>> (section 4.2.2. Binding constructs) with out much if any
understanding.
>>>
>>> I changed:
>>> (define (save-layer orig-image layer name)
>>>     (let* (
>>>         (image)
>>>         (buffer)
>>>         )
>>>
>>> to:
>>> (define (save-layer orig-image layer name)
>>>     (let* (
>>>         (this-is-correct 0)
>>>         (image)
>>>         (buffer)
>>>         )
>>>     
>>
>> You didn't need to read the linked PDF file. That is there for
reference in 
>> case someone doubted whether the Scheme interpreter in Script-Fu is
doing "the 
>> right thing" regarding the let* blocks.
>>
>> The release notes should have made it perfectly clear as to the
problem and 
>> its fix. Since it appears the note about Script-Fu isn't clear
enough I will 
>> think about some changes to the information. In the meantime, Sven has
pointed 
>> out the needed changes to the script that were referred to in the
release notes.
>>     
-- 
Regards ... Alec   ([EMAIL PROTECTED] & WinLiveMess - [EMAIL PROTECTED])

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: /lists/gimp-user/attachments/20081019/7c98d2d0/attachment-0001.html 

------------------------------

Message: 5
Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2008 22:57:50 -0400
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Gimp-user] export and save as gif dialogs
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
Message-ID:
        <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain;       charset=ISO-8859-1;     DelSp="Yes";
        format="flowed"

Here is the script. I tried to write it so that it would run on GIMP  
2.2 (as well as 2.4 and 2.6) but I have only tested it on version 2.6.

http://flashingtwelve.brickfilms.com/GIMP/Scripts/fast-gif-save.scm



------------------------------

Message: 6
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 03:06:24 +0000 (UTC)
From: Rick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [Gimp-user] ftp address for 2.6.1 rpm
To: gimp-user@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Anybody have an rpm for Centos 5.2?

--
http://yosemitephotos.net/



------------------------------


 "presyesc" wrote:


>Hello- When I make a feathered rectangular selection and fill it with >color,
>the edges are fuzzy and bland with background. Is there a way to fill it
>solidly?

Sure do NOT feather the selection.
or if the edges become too sharp decrease feathering radius.

Another method is click on the tiny square on the down left of image windows to 
enter in quickmask mode, and then apply gaussian blur.

Result is exactly the same with the advantage that you may visualize better how 
much is feathered the selection 

BTW this apply to any kind of selection not only rectangular




_______________________________________________
Gimp-user mailing list
Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


End of Gimp-user Digest, Vol 73, Issue 41
*****************************************


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Poco spazio e tanto spam? Yahoo! Mail ti protegge dallo spam e ti da tanto 
spazio gratuito per i tuoi file e i messaggi 
http://mail.yahoo.it 
_______________________________________________
Gimp-user mailing list
Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user

Reply via email to