Re: [Gimp-user] GIMP RENAMED and sold on eBay

2005-02-13 Thread David Neary
Hi, Mike Meyer wrote: Actually, the GPL says for a charge no more than your cost of physically performing the source distribution, without a word about the cost of the media. In particular, this leaves the issue of what you charge for the *time* taken to make the distribution. If you farm

RE: [Gimp-user] GIMP RENAMED and sold on eBay

2005-02-12 Thread regis rampnoux
On 12-Feb-2005 steve hudson wrote: You will be pleased to know the GIMP is making handsome profits for this eBay pirate with no reference to the real name: And other softwares on the same page are freeware and probably under copyright! He uses also the Ebay logo on the CDs... Do you have

Re: [Gimp-user] GIMP RENAMED and sold on eBay

2005-02-12 Thread pcg
On Sat, Feb 12, 2005 at 05:59:29PM +0800, steve hudson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You will be pleased to know the GIMP is making handsome profits for this eBay pirate with no reference to the real name: It might shock you, but it's completey legal, at least in most jurisdictions. The (GPL)

Re: [Gimp-user] GIMP RENAMED and sold on eBay

2005-02-12 Thread David Neary
Hi, steve hudson wrote: i think you'll find somewhere in GPL you cant distribute it under another name and have no reference to GPL on the site You're getting copyright (the licence) and trademarks (the name) mixed up. There is nothing preventing me from releasing what's in GIMP CVS as

Re: [Gimp-user] GIMP RENAMED and sold on eBay

2005-02-12 Thread Carol Spears
On Sat, Feb 12, 2005 at 05:53:57PM +0800, steve hudson wrote: You will be pleased to know the GIMP is making handsome profits for this eBay pirate with no reference to the real name: http://cgi.ebay.com.au/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemcategory=43454item=3873402992 userID freashlearning