On Thu, Jun 05, 2003 at 10:30:29AM +0100, Jonathan E. Paton wrote:
Retake the screenshot, after reducing the size of the window.
If you look at what the screenshot is of, you will notice that I can't
make the window much smaller since that would hide information, or pack it
very tightly.
At
On Thu, Jun 05, 2003 at 01:31:47PM +0200, Sven Neumann wrote:
$ du -sk *
52 screenshot.png
128 screenshot_resized.png
The new image is over 4 times bigger than the original!
128 / 52 = 2.46
Okay, I forgot how to divide. But still.
These are RGB images BTW, but that
Hi,
Daniel Carrera [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Thanks. I didn't realize that they were.
How do you tell appart an RGBA image from an RGB image?
Gimp calls them both RGB.
I used file foo.png but there are lots of indicators in GIMP as
well. The most obvious is probably if you can Flatten the
--- Daniel Carrera [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Jun 05, 2003 at 02:12:22AM +0200, Marco Wessel wrote:
My guess is that this is because of the interpolation when resampling.
Makes it less easily compressable. (Notice the 'anti-aliased' edges in
the resized picture?)
Marco Wessel
Hi,
Daniel Carrera [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This is really weird. I have a PNG image. I tried to make it
smaller by resizing it down, but instead it got BIGGER. I don't
understand this at all.
I put the images on the web:
Original: http://www.math.umd.edu/~dcarrera/screenshot.png
My guess is that this is because of the interpolation when resampling.
Makes it less easily compressable. (Notice the 'anti-aliased' edges in
the resized picture?)
Marco Wessel
On Wed, 4 Jun 2003, Daniel Carrera wrote:
Hi,
This is really weird. I have a PNG image. I tried to make it
On Thu, Jun 05, 2003 at 02:12:22AM +0200, Marco Wessel wrote:
My guess is that this is because of the interpolation when resampling.
Makes it less easily compressable. (Notice the 'anti-aliased' edges in
the resized picture?)
Marco Wessel
Any suggestion as to how to fix it?
--
Daniel
