Re: [Gimp-user] Best performance on 4000x2200 pixel images.

2005-01-30 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, William Skaggs [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I have noticed before that the previews for the image map tools (of which color balance is one) seem slower than they ought to be. The operation they are doing is extrememly simple, so they ought to be as fast as other simple tools like

Re: [Gimp-user] Best performance on 4000x2200 pixel images.

2005-01-29 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, Dana Sibera [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I'm having what seem to be performance issues with editing some images about 4000x2200 pixels (they're panoramas of multiple photos), and would like some advice on the best settings in GIMP for RAM use, or whether what I'm seeing is normal. I have

Re: [Gimp-user] Best performance on 4000x2200 pixel images.

2005-01-29 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, Joao S. O. Bueno Calligaris [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I am afraid you've hit a design issue with the GIMP - when adjusting colors via tools, i t simply operates on the whole image for each preview step. I don't think this counts as a design issue. A design problem would be something that

Re: [Gimp-user] Best performance on 4000x2200 pixel images.

2005-01-28 Thread William Skaggs
Dana Silbera wrote: In any case, the specific problem I'm getting is while colour balancing of the final image, and each shift of the slider requires a bit over 20 seconds to complete the colour change over the image, which seems slower than it should be. It's just a little difficult to