Re: [Gimp-user] Blur plug-in
Hi, "Nonexistent Entity" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Different actually, most often random: 0 or randomize, randomization:100% > repeat:1 (sometimes more repeats). > I don't really understand its options but I like the effect. > And it seems to be faster than others. > Maybe it does the same (as which one?), and it's a placebo effect, but > after some trial, I prefer using it. Looks like you are using the blur plug-in with exactly the parameters we want to keep as defaults. So you wouldn't need the dialog and should benefit from the proposed changes. Sven ___ Gimp-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Re: [Gimp-user] Blur plug-in
"Sven Neumann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >Would you mind to tell us what parameters you are using the plug-in >with? Different actually, most often random: 0 or randomize, randomization:100% repeat:1 (sometimes more repeats). I don't really understand its options but I like the effect. And it seems to be faster than others. Maybe it does the same (as which one?), and it's a placebo effect, but after some trial, I prefer using it. ___ Gimp-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Re: [Gimp-user] Blur plug-in
Hi, "Nonexistent Entity" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I use this plug-in, it can give different results than other blur > plug-ins, and these results sometimes seem to fit more than RLE and > IIR. Would you mind to tell us what parameters you are using the plug-in with? Sven ___ Gimp-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Re: [Gimp-user] Blur plug-in
I use this plug-in, it can give different results than other blur plug-ins, and these results sometimes seem to fit more than RLE and IIR. ___ Gimp-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Re: [Gimp-user] Blur plug-in
Hi, Alexander Rabtchevich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Why not to simply add new plugin with 3x3 convolution and call it > Blur? And leave old one with new name "Random blur". Because we are trying to simplify our menus. Suggesting to add yet another entry to the Blur menu is counter-productive. I've been asking for a use case; do you have one? We can always put the Randomized Blur plug-in to the registry and if someone really needs it, she can install it from there. Sven ___ Gimp-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Re: [Gimp-user] Blur plug-in
Why not to simply add new plugin with 3x3 convolution and call it Blur? And leave old one with new name "Random blur". Sven Neumann wrote: Hi, I'd like to get some feedback on the following plan for the Blur plug-in (details are in http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=142318): The plan is to remove the randomize and repeat functionality. That would allow us to also remove the (quite confusing) dialog. Filters->Blur->Blur would then be a simple blur with a 3x3 convolution kernel. It would be fast and easy to use but of course we it would be less powerful. So the question is, is anyone actually using this functionality? Are there scripts out there that rely on plug-in-blur-randomize to be available? -- With respect Alexander Rabtchevich ___ Gimp-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Re: [Gimp-user] Blur plug-in
Hi, Sven Neumann wrote: I'd like to get some feedback on the following plan for the Blur plug-in (details are in http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=142318): The plan is to remove the randomize and repeat functionality. That would allow us to also remove the (quite confusing) dialog. Sounds OK to me. Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Neary [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Gimp-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
