Re: [Gimp-user] Build probs w/2.1
Hi, Patrick Shanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: * Eric Pierce [EMAIL PROTECTED] [06-10-04 18:31]: I just upgrade to SuSE 9.1. I grabbed the following rpms from www.usr-local-bin.org: ... make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/dit/downloads/gimp-2.1.0' make: *** [all] Error 2 ... I'm stumped. Any ideas, anyone? Me 2. Why didn't you get the rpm for gimp 2.1 also at the same location? gimp-beta-2.1.0-100.SuSE.ulb.1.i586.rpm Who the fuck distributes binary packages of gimp-2.1 although we explicitely asked people not to? Someone please contact the author of this RPM and ask it to be taken down. Sven ___ Gimp-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Re: [Gimp-user] Build probs w/2.1
Hi, Eric Pierce [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I just upgrade to SuSE 9.1. I grabbed the following rpms from www.usr-local-bin.org: gtk-2.4.2 (plus devel) ATK 1.6.0 (plus devel) Glib 2.4.2 (plus devel) Pango 1.4.0 (plus devel) 'configure' goes smoothly, but during 'make' it craps out with the following: gimpviewable.c: In function `gimp_viewable_get_dummy_pixbuf': gimpviewable.c:739: error: `stock_question_64' undeclared (first use in this function) gimpviewable.c:739: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once gimpviewable.c:739: error: for each function it appears in.) There's most likely a problem with gdk-pixbuf-csource. My guess is that the pixbuf-loaders file could not be generated because your GTK+ installation is broken. Remove the file themes/Default/images/gimp-stock-pixbufs.h and rerun make. Watch out for errors when the header file is being rebuilt. Sven ___ Gimp-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Re: [Gimp-user] Build probs w/2.1
* Eric Pierce [EMAIL PROTECTED] [06-10-04 18:31]: I just upgrade to SuSE 9.1. I grabbed the following rpms from www.usr-local-bin.org: ... make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/dit/downloads/gimp-2.1.0' make: *** [all] Error 2 ... I'm stumped. Any ideas, anyone? Me 2. Why didn't you get the rpm for gimp 2.1 also at the same location? gimp-beta-2.1.0-100.SuSE.ulb.1.i586.rpm -- Patrick ShanahanRegistered Linux User #207535 http://wahoo.no-ip.org@ http://counter.li.org HOG # US1244711 Photo Album: http://wahoo.no-ip.org/photos ___ Gimp-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Re: [Gimp-user] Build probs w/2.1
On Thu, 10 Jun 2004, Eric Pierce wrote: gimpviewable.c: In function `gimp_viewable_get_dummy_pixbuf': gimpviewable.c:739: error: `stock_question_64' undeclared (first use in this function) It seems you're missing a declaration or possibly a header file? I would delete the current source and start over. If that doesn't work then I would do a search for the function/variable on the net and try to get the header file and possibly the library or source that defines the function, if it is a function and place it somewhere that it can be found. Hopes that help, Thong ___ Gimp-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
