unsubscribe
-Message d'origine-
De : Guillermo S. Romero / Familia Romero [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Envoyé : jeudi 21 septembre 2000 22:37
À : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Objet : Re: Does this filter exist?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (2000-09-21 at 2210.43 +0200):
I should also mention that I would
unsubsribe
-Message d'origine-
De : Jon Winters [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Envoyé : dimanche 24 septembre 2000 04:47
À : Stephan Henningsen
Cc : Ben FrantzDale; Ian Boreham; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Objet : Re: Does this filter exist?
On Thu, 21 Sep 2000, Stephan Henningsen wrote:
On Fri
unsubscribe
-Message d'origine-
De : Stephan Henningsen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Envoyé : jeudi 21 septembre 2000 22:11
À : Jon Winters
Cc : Ben FrantzDale; Ian Boreham; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Objet : Re: Does this filter exist?
On Fri, 22 Sep 2000, Jon Winters wrote:
I should also
On Wed, Sep 20, 2000 at 09:42:44PM +0200, Stephan Henningsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
number of pixels in my image so that the extra pixels are interpolated,
rather than simply repeated?"
Exactly. How do I do that? =)
Use the scale tool or "Image-Scale Image". The answer is so obvious
On Thu, 21 Sep 2000, Marc Lehmann wrote:
Use the scale tool or "Image-Scale Image". The answer is so obvious that
I still don't think this is what you wanted to know?
Thats how I do it but I try to avoid scaling things UP.
--
Jon Winters http://www.obscurasite.com/
"Everybody loves the
On Thu, 21 Sep 2000, Marc Lehmann wrote:
On Wed, Sep 20, 2000 at 09:42:44PM +0200, Stephan Henningsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
number of pixels in my image so that the extra pixels are interpolated,
rather than simply repeated?"
Exactly. How do I do that? =)
Use the scale tool or
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (2000-09-21 at 2206.16 +0200):
Use the scale tool or "Image-Scale Image". The answer is so obvious that
I still don't think this is what you wanted to know?
And that won't stretch it like any ordinary (paint brush)
graphics tool would?
Yes, it would distort it.
I mean
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (2000-09-21 at 2210.43 +0200):
I should also mention that I would scale things up only as a last
resort. If possible re photograph or re scan at a higher resolution.
Say I have a 640x480 JPG I use for desktop background. I'd
like that to be 1152x864. I can't simply
On Thu, 21 Sep 2000, Stephan Henningsen wrote:
On Fri, 22 Sep 2000, Jon Winters wrote:
I should also mention that I would scale things up only as a last
resort. If possible re photograph or re scan at a higher resolution.
Say I have a 640x480 JPG I use for desktop background. I'd
- Original Message -
From: Stephan Henningsen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Marc Lehmann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Ian Boreham [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 21, 2000 1:06 PM
Subject: Re: Does this filter exist?
On Thu, 21 Sep 2000, Marc Lehmann wrote:
On Wed
On Mon, 18 Sep 2000, Ian Boreham wrote:
At 04:39 AM 16/09/2000 +0200, Marc Lehmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Sep 14, 2000 at 08:12:44PM +0200, Stephan Henningsen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there a filter to blow an image up in double size and
calculate the extra pixels, instead of
[...]
Neither "blow up" nor "stretch pixels" are well-defined terms. What do
you
mean by them?
I would assume that the intended question here is "How do I increase the
number of pixels in my image so that the extra pixels are interpolated,
rather than simply repeated?"
(just to
On Wed, 20 Sep 2000, Ben FrantzDale wrote:
snip
I think the ting to do is scale up normally, then use something like unsharp
mask to get some detail back. I remember seeing a link (perhaps from this
list) that was to information on unsharp mask and an even better shaprening
filter someone
On Thu, Sep 14, 2000 at 08:12:44PM +0200, Stephan Henningsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there a filter to blow an image up in double size and
calculate the extra pixels, instead of simply stretching
them, as it is done usually.
Neither "blow up" nor "stretch pixels" are well-defined terms.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (2000-09-14 at 2012.44 +0200):
Is there a filter to blow an image up in double size and
calculate the extra pixels, instead of simply stretching
them, as it is done usually.
Two tricks:
- perfect one but limited: zoom image to 200% and screenshot. Problem
is when ou image
15 matches
Mail list logo