Re: [Gimp-web] Getting involved with the "Get Involved" web page

2015-10-24 Thread Andrew Toskin
On 2015-10-23 06:35, Pat David wrote: > It seems that the list may have stripped out your attachment? Huh. I'll try attaching it again, but just in case, here's the patch file pasted below. >From 580337e443bcca55b1e70bae72fcebcf9cdc50e6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Andrew

Re: [Gimp-web] Getting involved with the "Get Involved" web page

2015-10-26 Thread Andrew Toskin
... Whatever. Try downloading the patch from my website. <https://andrew.to sk.in/patches/2015-10-22--explain-how-to-contribute-to-the-gimp -projects.patch> ~Andrew On Mon, 2015-10-26 at 20:49 -0700, Andrew Toskin wrote: > On Mon, 2015-10-26 at 19:12 +, Pat David wrote: > > And

Re: [Gimp-web] Getting involved with the "Get Involved" web page

2015-10-26 Thread Andrew Toskin
at, Oct 24, 2015 at 3:18 PM Andrew Toskin <and...@tosk.in> wrote: > > > > > > On 2015-10-23 06:35, Pat David wrote: > > > > > > > It seems that the list may have stripped out your attachment? > > > > > > Huh. I'l

Re: [Gimp-web] Getting involved with the "Get Involved" web page

2015-10-27 Thread Andrew Toskin
patient and re-sending. Helping to > ease the process of contributions is definitely something we'll look > at soon, but for now if you want to submit any other patches, please > attach them in bugzilla. > > On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 11:27 PM Andrew Toskin <and...@tosk.in> >

Re: [Gimp-web] Getting involved with the "Get Involved" web page

2015-10-28 Thread Andrew Toskin
...Oh, never mind, I see you already added a line about the Bugzilla. So we're good, then. I'll probably go straight to the Bugzilla for the next patch, though. Thanks, ~Andrew On Tue, 2015-10-27 at 13:07 -0700, Andrew Toskin wrote: > Okay, I'm glad we got it through. > > I'll sen

Re: [Gimp-web] Microdata markup formats

2015-11-25 Thread Andrew Toskin
You can definitely mix and match microdata formats without causing any issues, unless maybe you accidentally put conflicting information between the different formats. Changes to metadata in one format will need to be updated in all other formats. Shouldn't be too hard to keep straight.

Re: [Gimp-web] Social media: consolidation of comments

2016-01-21 Thread Andrew Toskin
For consolidating discussions: on Twitter I don't think it's too hard to follow posts that tag #gimp or refer to the @gimp account. On Facebook, people could comment on the GIMP page's "wall." If what you really want is for people to be able to talk together in a single place, then probably a

Re: [Gimp-web] Gitlab as a replacement for registry.gimp.org

2016-04-01 Thread Andrew Toskin
I rather like GitLab, and this seems like at least as good a solution for a plugin registry as any other solution we've considered so far. In fact, I think GitLab (or some similar solution) would also be a major improvement for tracking the core GIMP software. As an occasional contributor

Re: [Gimp-web] Gitlab as a replacement for registry.gimp.org

2016-04-01 Thread Andrew Toskin
> On 2016-04-01 13:32, Pat David wrote: > > Organization > = > > Jehan suggested that each script/plugin/asset have it's own git repo. > This would be handy, particularly if script authors did this as well (as it > considerably eases the inclusion of external repos as submodules). >