> Gesendet: Montag, 04. April 2016 um 12:03 Uhr
> Von: "Jehan Pagès"
> When I read this, I understand that I am really not clear.
> So no, I am not saying and have never said that we would grab
> repository from "elsewhere". I know patdavid seemed to have such an
> idea at some point, but I th
> Gesendet: Montag, 04. April 2016 um 15:48 Uhr
> Von: "Jehan Pagès"
> On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 3:06 PM, Michael Schumacher wrote:
> > I am also still puzzled how the "one repository per 'script/plugin'" (we
> > really need a better term for that concept) approach will be managed.
>
> Let's cal
I'm writing up a response (with pictures and everything!) in a hope to
clarify some of the things... :)
On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 9:50 AM Kevin Payne wrote:
> At the risk of putting words into Pat's mouth, wasn't he referring to them
> as assets?
>
> Kevin
>
>
>
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 3:06 PM, Michael Schumacher wrote:
>> Gesendet: Montag, 04. April 2016 um 12:03 Uhr
>> Von: "Jehan Pagès"
>
>> When I read this, I understand that I am really not clear.
>
>> So no, I am not saying and have never said that we would grab
>> repository from "elsewhere".
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 2:50 AM, Akkana Peck wrote:
> Andrew Toskin writes:
>> > On 2016-04-01 13:32, Pat David wrote:
>> > Jehan suggested that each script/plugin/asset have it's own git repo.
>> > This would be handy, particularly if script authors did this as well (as it
>> > considerably e
On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 4:04 PM, Michael Schumacher wrote:
>> Gesendet: Montag, 04. April 2016 um 15:48 Uhr
>> Von: "Jehan Pagès"
>
>> On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 3:06 PM, Michael Schumacher wrote:
>
>> > I am also still puzzled how the "one repository per 'script/plugin'" (we
>> > really need a bett
At the risk of putting words into Pat's mouth, wasn't he referring to them as
assets?
Kevin
From: gimp-developer-list on behalf of
Jehan Pagès
Sent: 04 April 2016 15:19
To: Michael Schumacher
Cc: gimp-web-list; GIMP Developer List
Subject: Re: [Gimp-
Hi,
I didn't follow the whole discussion so I hope to not
repeat things that were already said.
One problem of the current registry (before it was broken)
is that there are compiled plug-ins for just one platform,
e.g. Win32, if compiled at all.
Therefore users of other or newer platforms, e.g.
Hi Sven!
On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 2:36 PM Sven Claussner wrote:
> One problem of the current registry (before it was broken)
> is that there are compiled plug-ins for just one platform,
> e.g. Win32, if compiled at all.
> Therefore users of other or newer platforms, e.g. OS X,
> either have to com
Jehan Pagès writes:
[on one repo per asset vs. one repo containing many assets]
> Really I don't understand this point which Akkana is raising. Has
> anyone ever made plugins for various software? I have, for a bunch,
> many dead now, some still living. And never have I ever thought "oh
> let's put
10 matches
Mail list logo
