Re: [Gimp-web] Which social media sites shall we support?

2015-11-29 Thread Alexandre Prokoudine
29 нояб. 2015 г. 15:11 пользователь "Alex" написал: > I am personnally on Diaspora (via Framasphere.org) and GNU Social (via Quitter.se). > I find it sad that we barely see libre/opensource software communicate > on those platforms, which, contrarily to Facebook, Twitter, & Google+, are truly >

Re: [Gimp-web] Which social media sites shall we support?

2015-11-29 Thread Alexandre Prokoudine
On Sun, Nov 29, 2015 at 8:50 PM, Michael Schumacher wrote: > On 29.11.2015 18:18, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote: > >> 2. Communication by its definition is supposed to be a mutual activity. And >> on social networks it's important to provide _prompt_ feedback. As far as I >> can tell, GNU Social has

Re: [Gimp-web] Which social media sites shall we support?

2015-11-29 Thread Alexandre Prokoudine
29 нояб. 2015 г. 23:08 пользователь "Michael Schumacher" написал: > > On 29.11.2015 18:18, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote: > > > and the only app that Diaspora has is unmaintained (since 2012) and > > badly rated. > > In active development, and (few, but) good ratings: > >

Re: [Gimp-web] Which social media sites shall we support?

2015-11-29 Thread Alex
Le 29/11/2015 11:58, Michael Schumacher a écrit : On 27.11.2015 16:11, Pat David wrote: Andrew, personally I'm only prepared to support Twitter, Google+, and Facebook. I don't (and shouldn't) mind if other people represent us there, but I'd personally feel more comfortable if I knew those

Re: [Gimp-web] Which social media sites shall we support?

2015-11-29 Thread Michael Schumacher
On 27.11.2015 16:11, Pat David wrote: >> Andrew, personally I'm only prepared to support Twitter, Google+, and >> Facebook. I don't (and shouldn't) mind if other people represent us >> there, but I'd personally feel more comfortable if I knew those people >> enough to trust them with this task.

Re: [Gimp-web] Which social media sites shall we support?

2015-11-27 Thread Pat David
I'm revisiting this soon, and think that, as Alex already mentioned, focusing on Twitter, G+, FB seems like a good start (a good case might be made for something like Pinterest as well, but I'll leave that for later at the moment). I'm actually thinking of forgoing any icons and instead including