[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Randal L. Schwartz) writes:

> >>>>> "Bill" == Bill Moseley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 
> Bill> At 02:22 PM 10/01/01 -0700, Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
> >> Heh.  I've asked for that a few times.  See the bottom of a few
> >> of my columns (google for site:stonehenge.com "mailto::host";).
> >> Linux Magazine column 16 for example contains:
> >> 
> >> sub URI::mailto::host { ""; } # workaround bug in LWP
> 
> Bill> Do you think UNIVERSAL is a better choice (or worse)?  That's a bit too
> Bill> global for my liking, but otherwise I need to think of all the schemes that
> Bill> I might encounter.  Right?  Would overriding URI's AUTOLOAD be a better
> Bill> approach?
> 
> Bill> sub UNIVERSAL::host { '' };
> Bill> sub UNIVERSAL::port { '' };
> Bill> sub UNIVERSAL::host_port { '' };
> 
> It would suffice to put them into URI::_generic, since all
> other schemes seem to inherit from there.

They don't; check mailto:, data:

But they all inherit from URI::

Regards,
Gisle

Reply via email to