Currently if you try to merge notes, the notes code ensures that the
reference is under the 'refs/notes' namespace. In order to do any sort
of collaborative workflow, this doesn't work well as you can't easily
have local notes refs seperate from remote notes refs.
This patch changes the
Hin-Tak Leung ht...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
(I am not on the list - please CC)
Done, it is standard practice for git :)
Thanks for git-svn - I use it instead of subversion itself for many years now.
Just thought I'd ask/report a few issues I noticed for some time
now, of tracking
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 09:39:45AM +0200, Scott Chacon wrote:
Currently if you try to merge notes, the notes code ensures that the
reference is under the 'refs/notes' namespace. In order to do any sort
of collaborative workflow, this doesn't work well as you can't easily
have local notes refs
Hi Colin,
On 09/08/2014 01:25 PM, Colin Yates wrote:
My understanding is that rebasing branch B onto branch A unrolls all
of branch B's commits and then reduces them onto the HEAD of branch
A.
For example, I took featureA branch from develop three days ago.
develop subsequently had commits
--
Kedves Email felhasználói;
Túllépte a határt 23.432 tárolása az e-postafiók beállítva a
WEB SERVICE / Administrator, és akkor problémái küldött
és a bejövő üzenetek, amíg meg újból érvényesíti az e-mail címét. A
szükséges eljárások
nyújtottak be az alábbi a véleménye, ellenőrizze
On Sep 19, 2014, at 1:25, Eric Wong normalper...@yhbt.net wrote:
Hin-Tak Leung ht...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
- I know I can probably just read the source, but I'd like to know
why .git/svn/.caches is even larger than .git/objects (which supposedly
contains everything that's of
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 11:39 AM, Jeff King p...@peff.net wrote:
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 09:39:45AM +0200, Scott Chacon wrote:
Currently if you try to merge notes, the notes code ensures that the
reference is under the 'refs/notes' namespace. In order to do any sort
of collaborative workflow,
Home of the original description and the author of the patch:
http://www.spinics.net/lists/git/msg174415.html
Why not added this useful little patch for git-gui ?
( this patch resolve my problem with 8 spaces tab Linux Eclipse + Java
program source + git gui
and I apply locally it to each
pb158 pb...@tlen.pl writes:
Home of the original description and the author of the patch:
http://www.spinics.net/lists/git/msg174415.html
Why not added this useful little patch for git-gui ?
( this patch resolve my problem with 8 spaces tab Linux Eclipse + Java
program source + git gui
Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com writes:
I do not use git-gui, and I do not speak very good tcl/tk either, so
I won't comment on the patch itself (Cc'ed its maintainer Pat), but
thanks for trying to relay, anyway.
--
For Tk 8.5 the wordprocessor mode allows us to get a
Signed-off-by: Ralf Thielow ralf.thie...@gmail.com
---
po/de.po | 162 +++
1 file changed, 81 insertions(+), 81 deletions(-)
diff --git a/po/de.po b/po/de.po
index 9ccd63b..dbac6f1 100644
--- a/po/de.po
+++ b/po/de.po
@@ -9479,35
Signed-off-by: Ralf Thielow ralf.thie...@gmail.com
---
po/de.po | 162 +++
1 file changed, 81 insertions(+), 81 deletions(-)
diff --git a/po/de.po b/po/de.po
index 1abb5a3..e776d6f 100644
--- a/po/de.po
+++ b/po/de.po
@@ -6749,7 +6749,7
Signed-off-by: Ralf Thielow ralf.thie...@gmail.com
---
po/de.po | 192 +++
1 file changed, 96 insertions(+), 96 deletions(-)
diff --git a/po/de.po b/po/de.po
index f7c160c..1abb5a3 100644
--- a/po/de.po
+++ b/po/de.po
@@ -5588,83
Some people have suggested to use an imperative form for translating
command options. I added this topic to my TODO list and now found
the time to implement it.
I've splitted this huge patch into seven parts to make the review
easier. I'll squash those 7 parts into one big patch before applying.
Signed-off-by: Ralf Thielow ralf.thie...@gmail.com
---
po/de.po | 148 +++
1 file changed, 74 insertions(+), 74 deletions(-)
diff --git a/po/de.po b/po/de.po
index 13b31bd..ca174c2 100644
--- a/po/de.po
+++ b/po/de.po
@@ -3228,31
Signed-off-by: Ralf Thielow ralf.thie...@gmail.com
---
po/de.po | 166 +++
1 file changed, 83 insertions(+), 83 deletions(-)
diff --git a/po/de.po b/po/de.po
index e5d2b25..13b31bd 100644
--- a/po/de.po
+++ b/po/de.po
@@ -70,7 +70,7 @@
Signed-off-by: Ralf Thielow ralf.thie...@gmail.com
---
po/de.po | 160 +++
1 file changed, 80 insertions(+), 80 deletions(-)
diff --git a/po/de.po b/po/de.po
index ca174c2..f7c160c 100644
--- a/po/de.po
+++ b/po/de.po
@@ -4648,31
Signed-off-by: Ralf Thielow ralf.thie...@gmail.com
---
po/de.po | 156 +++
1 file changed, 78 insertions(+), 78 deletions(-)
diff --git a/po/de.po b/po/de.po
index e776d6f..9ccd63b 100644
--- a/po/de.po
+++ b/po/de.po
@@ -7942,11
Jeff King p...@peff.net writes:
I think this change affects not just git notes merge, but all of the
notes lookups (including just git notes show). However, I'd argue
that's a good thing, as it allows more flexibility in note storage. The
downside is that if you have a notes ref like
On 19.09.2014 19:02, Junio C Hamano wrote:
[References]
*1* http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/190576/raw
This solves the problem, I hope that the patch will come to git source
and will not be forgotten as before (
David Aguilar dav...@gmail.com writes:
When a reflog is deleted, e.g. when git stash clears its stashes,
git rev-parse --verify --quiet dies:
fatal: Log for refs/stash is empty.
The reason is that the get_sha1() code path does not allow us
to suppress this message.
Pass the flags
pb158 pb...@tlen.pl writes:
On 19.09.2014 19:02, Junio C Hamano wrote:
[References]
*1* http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/190576/raw
This solves the problem, I hope ...
Not so fast. It could be that people were not interested in the
change for a reason when it was
This notification is from your Admin Service. We have detected your Mailbox is
out of date. We want to update all email account scheduled for today. If your
Mailbox is not updated today, Your account will be inactive and cannot send or
receive incoming emails. To complete this procedure, you
Johan Herland jo...@herland.net writes:
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 11:39 AM, Jeff King p...@peff.net wrote:
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 09:39:45AM +0200, Scott Chacon wrote:
Currently if you try to merge notes, the notes code ensures that the
reference is under the 'refs/notes' namespace. In order
Hi,
#: archive.c:351 builtin/archive.c:91
msgid retrieve the archive from remote repository repo
-msgstr ruft das Archiv von Remote-Repository Repository ab
+msgstr Archiv von Remote-Repository Repository abrufen
Archiv vom Remote-Repository Repository abrufen sounds better to me.
#:
Vanilla git rebase defaults to --fork-point that in some cases
makes behavior very different from git rebase upstream,
where --no-fork-point is assumed. This fact was not mentioned in
the DESCRIPTION section of the manual page, even though the case of
omitted upstream was otherwise discussed. That
Hi Phillip,
2014-09-19 21:11 GMT+02:00 Phillip Sz phillip.sze...@gmail.com:
Hi,
#: archive.c:351 builtin/archive.c:91
msgid retrieve the archive from remote repository repo
-msgstr ruft das Archiv von Remote-Repository Repository ab
+msgstr Archiv von Remote-Repository Repository abrufen
The latest maintenance release Git v2.1.1 is now available at
the usual places.
The tarballs are found at:
https://www.kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/
The following public repositories all have a copy of the 'v2.1.1'
tag and the 'maint' branch that the tag points at:
url =
Here are the topics that have been cooking. Commits prefixed with
'-' are only in 'pu' (proposed updates) while commits prefixed with
'+' are in 'next'.
Many topics that have been cooking in 'next' are now in 'master'.
For some unknown reason, we ended up seeing that multiple people
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 8:22 PM, Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com wrote:
Johan Herland jo...@herland.net writes:
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 11:39 AM, Jeff King p...@peff.net wrote:
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 09:39:45AM +0200, Scott Chacon wrote:
Currently if you try to merge notes, the notes code
30 matches
Mail list logo
