Наш офисный контакт, 2554 Дороги Кпэлайм Фэйс Фармаки Бет, Ломе, Залив.
Международный валютный фонд (МВФ) дает компенсацию всем жертвам
жульничества, и Ваш адрес электронной почты был найден в list.this
офисе Western Union жертвы жульничества, получил мандат МВФ передать
Вашу компенсацию Вам
Наш офисный контакт, 2554 Дороги Кпэлайм Фэйс Фармаки Бет, Ломе, Залив.
Международный валютный фонд (МВФ) дает компенсацию всем жертвам
жульничества, и Ваш адрес электронной почты был найден в list.this
офисе Western Union жертвы жульничества, получил мандат МВФ передать
Вашу компенсацию Вам
WU BANK.rtf
Description: RTF file
Good Day,
I am Mr. Alfred Cheuk Yu Chow, the Director for Credit & Marketing
Chong Hing Bank, Hong Kong, Chong Hing Bank Centre, 24 Des Voeux Road
Central, Hong Kong. I have a business proposal of $38,980,369.00.
All confirmable documents to back up the claims will be made available
astian writes:
> Stop saying that smtpEncryption (a configuration variable used by
> git-send-email) is not usable in "sendemail." subsections,
> because that's false.
Hmph, does anybody know when this stopped being true, or was it
incorrect from the very beginning?
>
>
astian writes:
> Add a paragraph explaining what happens when a section name is repeated
> in the configuration file(s).
>
> The example configuration file shown in this document already implied
> Git's behaviour, this patch simply tries to make it explicit.
>
> Signed-off-by:
Kaartic Sivaraam writes:
> Just wanted to know something out of curiosity. How am I actually
> receiving these "What's cooking" emails though I'm not a subscriber to
> the mailing list to which this is being addressed?
By having a contribution listed in the
René Scharfe writes:
> Am 08.07.2017 um 13:08 schrieb Ramsay Jones:
>> On 08/07/17 09:58, René Scharfe wrote:
>>> Avoid running over the end of another -- a C string whose length we
>>> don't know -- by using strcmp(3) instead of memcmp(3) for comparing it
>>> with another C
Stop saying that smtpEncryption (a configuration variable used by
git-send-email) is not usable in "sendemail." subsections,
because that's false.
Signed-off-by: astian
---
Documentation/config.txt | 5 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git
Clarify the meaning of --smtp-encryption and --smtp-server-option.
Signed-off-by: astian
---
Documentation/git-send-email.txt | 15 +--
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/git-send-email.txt
Signed-off-by: astian
---
Documentation/config.txt | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/config.txt b/Documentation/config.txt
index d5c9c4cab..72e85b002 100644
--- a/Documentation/config.txt
+++ b/Documentation/config.txt
@@
Add a paragraph explaining what happens when a section name is repeated
in the configuration file(s).
The example configuration file shown in this document already implied
Git's behaviour, this patch simply tries to make it explicit.
Signed-off-by: astian
---
Hi there,
I was looking into adding a new option to git-send-email (and I may
later send the patches implementing that) but as I looked over the code
and associated documentation I found a few places where I thought
improvement could be made. So here are some documentation fixes and
RS> Subject: [PATCH] progress: show overall rate in last update
RS> Reported-by: 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson
RS> Signed-off-by: Rene Scharfe
Thanks!
Hi Everyone,
When I updated from git-2.10.2 to git-2.13.2 my 'color.branch.local'
config setting gets ignored. Corresponding 'remote' or 'current'
settings are honored and work as expected
Relevant parts of my config file is:
[color "branch"]
current= reverse
local = red bold
Please help me
Am 07.07.2017 um 17:57 schrieb 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson:
> Receiving objects: 100% (1003/1003), 1.15 MiB | 0 bytes/s, done.
> Receiving objects: 100% (1861/1861), 11.74 MiB | 4.58 MiB/s, done.
> Receiving objects: 100% (474/474), 160.72 KiB | 0 bytes/s, done.
> Receiving objects: 100% (7190/7190), 26.02
Am 08.07.2017 um 16:28 schrieb Kyle J. McKay:
On Jul 8, 2017, at 01:59, René Scharfe wrote:
Simplify the code by using hex2chr() to convert and check for invalid
characters at the same time instead of doing that sequentially with
one table lookup for each.
I think that comment may be a bit
On Jul 8, 2017, at 01:59, René Scharfe wrote:
Simplify the code by using hex2chr() to convert and check for invalid
characters at the same time instead of doing that sequentially with
one table lookup for each.
I think that comment may be a bit misleading as the changes are just
switching
On Jul 08 2017, René Scharfe wrote:
> Am 08.07.2017 um 13:08 schrieb Andreas Schwab:
>> On Jul 08 2017, René Scharfe wrote:
>>
>>> Avoid running over the end of another -- a C string whose length we
>>> don't know -- by using strcmp(3) instead of memcmp(3) for
Just wanted to know something out of curiosity. How am I actually
receiving these "What's cooking" emails though I'm not a subscriber to
the mailing list to which this is being addressed ? Further, my email
address isn't list in the To, Cc or Bcc fields.
I wanted to know this as, this has been
Am 08.07.2017 um 13:08 schrieb Ramsay Jones:
On 08/07/17 09:58, René Scharfe wrote:
Avoid running over the end of another -- a C string whose length we
don't know -- by using strcmp(3) instead of memcmp(3) for comparing it
with another C string.
I had to read this twice, along with the patch
Am 08.07.2017 um 13:08 schrieb Andreas Schwab:
On Jul 08 2017, René Scharfe wrote:
Avoid running over the end of another -- a C string whose length we
don't know -- by using strcmp(3) instead of memcmp(3) for comparing it
with another C string.
That's not a good justification
On 08/07/17 09:58, René Scharfe wrote:
> Avoid running over the end of another -- a C string whose length we
> don't know -- by using strcmp(3) instead of memcmp(3) for comparing it
> with another C string.
I had to read this twice, along with the patch text, before this
made any sense. ;-) The
On Jul 08 2017, René Scharfe wrote:
> Avoid running over the end of another -- a C string whose length we
> don't know -- by using strcmp(3) instead of memcmp(3) for comparing it
> with another C string.
That's not a good justification for the change, since memcmp never reads
past
Store the pointer to the string allocated by shorten_unambiguous_ref in
a dedicated variable, short_base, and keep base unchanged. A non-const
variable is more appropriate for such an object. It avoids having to
cast const away on free and stops redefining the meaning of base, making
the code
Convert code that divides and rounds up to use DIV_ROUND_UP to make the
intent clearer and reduce the number of magic constants.
Signed-off-by: Rene Scharfe
---
builtin/gc.c | 2 +-
builtin/grep.c | 2 +-
builtin/log.c | 2 +-
builtin/receive-pack.c | 2
Simplify the code by using hex2chr() to convert and check for invalid
characters at the same time instead of doing that sequentially with
one table lookup for each.
Signed-off-by: Rene Scharfe
---
urlmatch.c | 10 +-
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff
Add the slash between loose object subdirectory and file name just once
outside the loop instead of overwriting it with each readdir call.
Redefine baselen as the length with that slash, and add dirlen for the
length without it. The result is slightly less wasteful and can use the
the cheaper
Avoid running over the end of another -- a C string whose length we
don't know -- by using strcmp(3) instead of memcmp(3) for comparing it
with another C string.
Signed-off-by: Rene Scharfe
---
apply.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/apply.c
On Fri, Jul 7, 2017 at 8:35 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Ben Peart writes:
>
>> On 6/14/2017 2:36 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>>> Ben Peart writes:
>>>
> Having said all that, I think you are using this ONLY on windows;
> perhaps
31 matches
Mail list logo