> If we lose the Change-Id: footer without adding any new cruft in the
> commit object header, that would be a great success. It would
> be a failure if we end up touching the object header.
Yes, I was thinking along the same lines.
If obsolescence graph is stored as part of the commit header,
On 09/26, Paul-Sebastian Ungureanu wrote:
> From: Joel Teichroeb
>
> Add stash branch to the helper and delete the apply_to_branch
> function from the shell script.
>
> Checkout does not currently provide a function for checking out
> a branch as cmd_checkout does a large amount of sanity
On 09/26, Paul-Sebastian Ungureanu wrote:
> From: Joel Teichroeb
>
> Add a builtin helper for performing stash commands. Converting
> all at once proved hard to review, so starting with just apply
> lets conversion get started without the other commands being
> finished.
>
> The helper is being
> Subject: stash: update test cases conform to coding guidelines
s/stash/t3903/
s/conform/to &/
Alternatively the subject could also be "t3903: modernize style",
which would be a bit shorter, and still convey the same information to
a reader of 'git log --oneline'.
On 09/26, Paul-Sebastian
Hi Ananya,
On Sun, Sep 30, 2018 at 5:53 PM Ananya Krishna Maram
wrote:
>
> Hi Git Community, Christian and Johannes,
>
> My initial Outreachy got accepted.
Great! Welcome to the Git community!
[...]
> Having done a lot of assignment in C and
> bash scripting and keen interest to learn about
On 09/26, Paul-Sebastian Ungureanu wrote:
> Implement `strbuf_join_argv()` to join arguments
> into a strbuf.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paul-Sebastian Ungureanu
> ---
> strbuf.c | 15 +++
> strbuf.h | 7 +++
> 2 files changed, 22 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/strbuf.c b/strbuf.c
>
Hi Git Community, Christian and Johannes,
My initial Outreachy got accepted. My name is Ananya Krishna(her), I
am from south India. I completed my under-graduation. Due to some
problems, I decided to stay back at home. And currently I would like
to dedicate myself to learn from open communities.
Junio,
On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 06:24:53PM +0200, SZEDER Gábor wrote:
> Interdiff:
> diff --git a/t/t1700-split-index.sh b/t/t1700-split-index.sh
> index c8acbc50d0..f053bf83eb 100755
> --- a/t/t1700-split-index.sh
> +++ b/t/t1700-split-index.sh
> @@ -6,6 +6,9 @@ test_description='split index
Status variables were initialized in the collect phase and some
variables were later freed in the print functions.
A "struct wt_status" used to be sufficient for the output phase to
work. It was designed to be filled in the collect phase and consumed
in the output phase, but over time some
Junio suggested a cleanup patch, jc/wt-status-state-cleanup, which is
the basis for this patch.
This patch uses ss/wt-status-committable.
Update to fix a spelling error in the commet message
Stephen P. Smith (1):
roll wt_status_state into wt_status and populate in the collect phase
On Sat, Sep 29, 2018 at 05:30:04PM +0200, Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy wrote:
> In many config-related tests it's common to check if a config variable
> has expected value and we want to print the differences when the test
> fails. Doing it the normal way is three lines of shell code. Let's add
> a
On Sun, Sep 30, 2018 at 9:24 AM Eric Sunshine wrote:
>
> On Sun, Sep 30, 2018 at 3:16 AM Duy Nguyen wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 30, 2018 at 6:33 AM Eric Sunshine
> > wrote:
> > > > diff --git a/builtin/config.c b/builtin/config.c
> > > > @@ -645,7 +649,20 @@ int cmd_config(int argc, const char
On Sun, Sep 30, 2018 at 3:16 AM Duy Nguyen wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 30, 2018 at 6:33 AM Eric Sunshine wrote:
> > > diff --git a/builtin/config.c b/builtin/config.c
> > > @@ -645,7 +649,20 @@ int cmd_config(int argc, const char **argv, const
> > > char *prefix)
> > > + else if
On Sun, Sep 30, 2018 at 6:33 AM Eric Sunshine wrote:
> > diff --git a/builtin/config.c b/builtin/config.c
> > @@ -645,7 +649,20 @@ int cmd_config(int argc, const char **argv, const char
> > *prefix)
> > + else if (use_worktree_config) {
> > + struct worktree **worktrees =
14 matches
Mail list logo
