On 13/10/2015 19:07, Jacob Keller wrote:
> b) you are rebasing a commit which references another commit in the same
> rebase
>
> I see no valid reason to reference a sha1 in this case. If you're
> referencing as a "fixes", then you are being silly since you can just
> squash the fix into the
On 13/10/2015 15:29, Philip Oakley wrote:
> From: "Konstantin Khomoutov" <kostix+...@007spb.ru>
>> On Tue, 13 Oct 2015 10:50:40 +0200
>> Francois-Xavier Le Bail <devel.fx.leb...@orange.fr> wrote:
>>
>>> >> For example, if I rebase the
On 13/10/2015 20:00, Mike Rappazzo wrote:
> It seems reasonable that this could be added as a feature of
> interactive rebase. The todo list could be automatically adjusted to
> "reword" for those commits which are referring to other commits within
> the same rebase. As each commit is
On 12/10/2015 22:21, Matthieu Moy wrote:
> Francois-Xavier Le Bail <devel.fx.leb...@orange.fr> writes:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> [I try some search engines without success, perhaps I have missed something].
>>
>> For example, if I rebase the following commit
Hello,
[I try some search engines without success, perhaps I have missed something].
For example, if I rebase the following commits, I would want that if
the commit hash 222... become 777...,
the message
"Update test output for "
become
"Update
5 matches
Mail list logo