"Junio C Hamano" writes:
>Guillaume Pagès writes:
>> git status gives more information during rebase -i, about the list of
>> command that are done during the rebase. It displays the two last
>> commands executed and the two next lines to be executed. It also gives
>> hints to find the whol
"Junio C Hamano" writes:
>Hmmm, it obviously does not break anything but it is not obvious why
>this is a good change.
>Is it that you wanted to have a single instance of "if on a branch,
>we say 'you are rebasing that branch', otherwise we say 'you are
>rebasing'"? Even then, I am not sure
Junio C Hamano writes
>Matthieu Moy writes:
>>> +void get_two_last_lines(char *filename, int *numlines, char **lines)
>>> +{
>>> +...
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +void get_two_first_lines(char *filename, int *numlines, char **lines)
>>> +{
>>> +...
>>> +}
>I had a handful of comments on these:
Thanks for reviewing, I take everything into account and release a v2 ASAP.
Guillaume
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
After this discussion I eventually agree that it would be better
upgrading git status than creating a new command.When people use git
status, it means that they need information to continue their work, so
if you don't even know that you are in a rebase, you will very likely
need information about t
Git version : 2.4.1.652.g8fd8657
When we run git checkout -babar, we would expect an error message like
"unknown switch 'a' " and we get "Switched to a new branch 'abar'". We
are not sure since we don't entirely understand the syntax -b
which is shown in the documentation, but as average user
Hi,
"Paul Tan" :
> I haven't kept up with the discussion, but I'm wondering: since you
> need the functionality in wt-status.c, why not implement it in git
> status? In fact, git-status already shows if there is a rebase in
> progress, so why not extend it to say which patch/todo line the r
Junio C Hamano writes:
>Guillaume Pages writes:
>> Do you think it could be useful or do you have any suggestion?
>All of your examples say things like:
>> You are in the middle of a rebase session.
>> The line that paused this session is:
>but what if ther
Hi,
I would like to implement a new command git rebase --status to inform the user
about the current rebase session. Here is a sample of what I think it could
look like in case of merge conflict:
git rebase --status
You are in the middle of a rebase session.
The line that paused this sessio
9 matches
Mail list logo