On Mon, Apr 06, 2015 at 09:27:53AM -0300, Steven Huang wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We know git uses cURL to grab https repositories from the Internet.
> Nowadays
> the SSL-enabled git repos are getting more and more, especially
> self-hosted
> ones.
>
> Some of the websites including those
On Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 04:21:26AM +0200, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
> On Sat, 2015-03-28 at 15:31 +0100, Kevin D wrote:
> [..]
>
> > * reflog (history of refs, though, by default disabled for bare
> > repositories)
> is there a way to get this copied?
>
>
On Sat, Mar 28, 2015 at 03:56:37AM +0100, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
> Hey.
>
> I was looking for an ideally simple way to make a "full" copy of a git
> repo. Many howtos are floating around on this on the web, with also lots
> of voodoo.
>
>
> First, it shouldn't be just a clone, i.o.w.
>
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 11:00:21AM +0100, Christian Couder wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Git Rev News edition 1 is now available:
>
> http://git.github.io/rev_news/edition-1.html
>
> Thanks a lot to all the contributors and helpers, especially Junio!
>
> Enjoy,
> Christian and Thomas.
Thank you for your wo
On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 02:06:33PM -0400, David A. Wheeler wrote:
> Warn cloners if there is no LICENSE* or COPYING* file that makes
> the license clear. This is a useful warning, because if there is
> no license somewhere, then local copyright laws (which forbid many uses)
> and terms of service
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 04:02:38AM +0530, Sundararajan R wrote:
> Yes. I made a mistake while framing the sentence. I should have proof read
> the commit message more thoroughly. Should I submit a new patch with the
> corrected commit message?
Yeah, you can combine that with the comments from Mat
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 02:05:09PM +0530, Sundararajan R wrote:
> The failure case which occurs on teaching git is taught the '-' shorthand
> is when there exists no branch pointed to by '@{-1}'. But, if there is a file
> named - in the working tree, the user can be unambiguously assumed to be
> r
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 07:14:52AM +, Bharat Suvarna wrote:
> Thanks all .. I will have a look. But could I just set this up on my laptop
> and checking this works on system first before installing one of Git on server
>
Sure, that's no problem. Git happily runs just locally on your own
mach
On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 11:33:54PM +, Bharat Suvarna wrote:
> Hi
>
> I am trying to find a way of using version control on PLC programmers like
> Allen Bradley PLC. I can't find a way of this.
>
> Could you please give me an idea if it will work with Plc programs. Which are
> basically Lad
On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 05:58:19PM +0100, t.gumme...@gmail.com wrote:
> On 03/15, Arup Rakshit wrote:
> > On Sunday, March 15, 2015 01:30:04 PM you wrote:
> > >
> > > With --assume-unchanged you're promising git that you will not change
> > > a file that is already in the repository. Git doesn't
Subject is usually prefixed with the part that is changed, in this case
log.
For example:
log: forbid log --graph --no-walk
On Sat, Mar 14, 2015 at 11:31:59PM +0200, epilys wrote:
> In git-log, --graph shows a graphical representation of a
> continuous commit history, and --no-walk shows discre
On Sat, Mar 07, 2015 at 01:30:07AM +, Ken Moffat wrote:
> Hi, please CC me if that is not your usual fashion, because I am not
> subscribed.
>
> I use git for my build scripts - those are accessed over nfs. Since
> I started using 2.1 and later (I don't think I used 2.0) commands
> such as 'c
On Fri, Mar 06, 2015 at 02:39:58AM +, Phil Hord (hordp) wrote:
> I have a repo whose workdir tends to get pretty dirty as I jump around from
> branch to branch tending weeds and whatnot. Sometimes when I try to switch
> branches git refuses because of local file changes.
>
> git checkout
13 matches
Mail list logo
