Re: [PATCH 2/2] Documentation: convert SubmittingPatches to AsciiDoc

On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 6:21 PM, Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schinde...@gmx.de> wrote: > Hi Paolo, > > On Mon, 30 Oct 2017, Paolo Ciarrocchi wrote: > >> On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 1:35 PM, Johannes Schindelin >> <johannes.schinde...@gmx.de> wrote: >> > &

Re: [PATCH 2/2] Documentation: convert SubmittingPatches to AsciiDoc

On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 1:35 PM, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, 30 Oct 2017, Junio C Hamano wrote: > >> "brian m. carlson" writes: >> >> Thanks. I personally prefer the plain-text original, but I do >> understand the need

Re: [PATCH 0/5] Use watchman to reduce index refresh time

On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 10:21 AM, Duy Nguyen wrote: >> It was from last year. I may have measured it but because I didn't >> save it in the commit message, it was lost anyway. Installing watchman >> and measuring with webkit.git soon.. > > Test repo: webkit.git with 104665

Re: [PATCH 0/5] Use watchman to reduce index refresh time

On Sun, Nov 1, 2015 at 2:55 PM, Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy wrote: Hi Duy, > This series builds on top of the index-helper series I just sent and > uses watchman to keep track of file changes in order to avoid lstat() > at refresh time. The series can also be found at [1] > > When I

Re: [RFC] On watchman support

On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 1:25 AM, David Turner dtur...@twopensource.com wrote: My patches are not the world's most beautiful, but they do work. Out of curiosity: do you run the patches at twitter? Thanks. -- Paolo -- Paolo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe git in

Re: [PATCH] remote-helpers: point at their upstream repositories

On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 10:41 AM, Jeff King p...@peff.net wrote: But that being said, this is Felipe's code. While we have a legal right to distribute it in v2.0, if he would really prefer it out for v2.0, I would respect that. My understanding is that Felipe would prefer to keep it _in_ the

Re: Should git-remote-hg/bzr be part of the core?

On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 2:48 PM, Felipe Contreras felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote: Paolo Ciarrocchi wrote: On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 11:42 AM, Michael Haggerty mhag...@alum.mit.eduwrote: While I agree with you the this project is managed in a bit conservative way Only a bit? I don't

Re: [IGNORE] Implement 'git rebase' in ruby

On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 11:47 PM, Felipe Contreras felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote: This is not my first patch that gets rejected, but it's the first one that gets rejected by Junio without even looking at it. What is anybody supposed to think about that? My very humble opinion: submit again