Re: Git reset --hard with staged changes

2014-06-10 17:27 GMT+02:00 David Kastrup : > Pierre-François CLEMENT writes: > >> 2014-06-10 1:28 GMT+02:00 Junio C Hamano : >>> Pierre-François CLEMENT writes: >>> >>>> Hm, I didn't think of "git apply --index"... Makes sense for this >

Re: Git reset --hard with staged changes

2014-06-10 1:28 GMT+02:00 Junio C Hamano : > Pierre-François CLEMENT writes: > >> Hm, I didn't think of "git apply --index"... Makes sense for this >> special use, but I'm not sure about the other use cases. > > Try merging another branch that track

Re: Git reset --hard with staged changes

2014-06-09 16:04 GMT+02:00 David Kastrup : > Pierre-François CLEMENT writes: > >> Hi all, >> >> Someone pointed out on the "Git for human beings" Google group >> (https://groups.google.com/d/topic/git-users/27_FxIV_100/discussion) >> that using git-

Re: Git reset --hard with staged changes

y doesn't touch untracked files, one could expect having staged untracked files reset to their previous "untracked" state rather than being deleted. Could this be a bug or a missing feature? Or if it isn't, can someone explain what we got wrong? Cheers -- Pierre-François CLEM