On Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 04:55:37PM +0100, Quentin Casasnovas wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 07:01:36AM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> > Duy Nguyen <pclo...@gmail.com> writes:
> >
> > > On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 6:23 PM, Quentin Casasnovas
> > >
On Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 07:01:36AM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Duy Nguyen <pclo...@gmail.com> writes:
>
> > On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 6:23 PM, Quentin Casasnovas
> > <quentin.casasno...@oracle.com> wrote:
> >> Is there any way to tell git, after the git ls-
On Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 01:17:24PM +0100, Quentin Casasnovas wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 07:02:45PM +0700, Duy Nguyen wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 6:23 PM, Quentin Casasnovas
> > <quentin.casasno...@oracle.com> wrote:
> >
> > > If not, I am wil
On Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 07:02:45PM +0700, Duy Nguyen wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 6:23 PM, Quentin Casasnovas
> <quentin.casasno...@oracle.com> wrote:
>
> > If not, I am willing to implement a --assume-content-unchanged to the git
> > update-index if you guys don't
Hi guys,
Apologies if this is documented somewhere, I have fairly bad search vudu
skills.
I'm looking for a way to cause a full refresh of the index without causing
any read of the files, basically telling git "trust me, all worktree files
are matching the index, but their stat information have
5 matches
Mail list logo