Re: [musl] Re: Git 2.14.1: t6500: error during test on musl libc

2017-09-16 Thread Rich Felker
On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 11:58:41PM -0500, A. Wilcox wrote: > On 15/09/17 06:30, Jeff King wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 08:37:40AM +0200, Kevin Daudt wrote: > > > >> On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 09:43:12PM -0500, A. Wilcox wrote: > >>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > >>> Hash: SHA256 > >>> >

Re: Regression: git no longer works with musl libc's regex impl

2016-10-06 Thread Rich Felker
On Thu, Oct 06, 2016 at 03:23:40PM -0400, Jeff King wrote: > On Thu, Oct 06, 2016 at 09:18:29PM +0200, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote: > > > On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 6:08 PM, Johannes Schindelin > > wrote: > > > As to making NO_REGEX conditional on REG_STARTEND: you are

Re: [musl] Re: Regression: git no longer works with musl libc's regex impl

2016-10-05 Thread Rich Felker
On Wed, Oct 05, 2016 at 12:11:58PM -0400, Jeff King wrote: > On Wed, Oct 05, 2016 at 10:59:34PM +1100, James B wrote: > > > Number downloads does not make first-tier platform. You know that as > > well as everyone else. > > > > First-tier support is the decision made by the maintainers that the

Re: [musl] Re: Regression: git no longer works with musl libc's regex impl

2016-10-05 Thread Rich Felker
On Wed, Oct 05, 2016 at 03:11:05PM +0200, Jakub Narębski wrote: > W dniu 05.10.2016 o 00:33, Rich Felker pisze: > > On Wed, Oct 05, 2016 at 09:06:25AM +1100, James B wrote: > >> On Tue, 4 Oct 2016 18:08:33 +0200 (CEST) > >> Johannes Schindelin <joh

Re: [musl] Re: Regression: git no longer works with musl libc's regex impl

2016-10-05 Thread Rich Felker
On Wed, Oct 05, 2016 at 01:17:49PM +0200, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > Hi Rich, > > On Tue, 4 Oct 2016, Rich Felker wrote: > > > On Tue, Oct 04, 2016 at 06:08:33PM +0200, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > > > > > And lastly, the best alternative would be to te

Re: [musl] Re: Regression: git no longer works with musl libc's regex impl

2016-10-04 Thread Rich Felker
On Wed, Oct 05, 2016 at 09:06:25AM +1100, James B wrote: > On Tue, 4 Oct 2016 18:08:33 +0200 (CEST) > Johannes Schindelin wrote: > > > > > No, it is not. You quote POSIX, but the matter of the fact is that we use > > a subset of POSIX in order to be able to keep

Re: [musl] Re: Regression: git no longer works with musl libc's regex impl

2016-10-04 Thread Rich Felker
On Tue, Oct 04, 2016 at 06:08:33PM +0200, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > Hi Rich, > > On Tue, 4 Oct 2016, Rich Felker wrote: > > > On Tue, Oct 04, 2016 at 11:27:22AM -0400, Jeff King wrote: > > > On Tue, Oct 04, 2016 at 11:08:48AM -0400, Rich Felker wrote: > >

Re: Regression: git no longer works with musl libc's regex impl

2016-10-04 Thread Rich Felker
On Tue, Oct 04, 2016 at 06:08:33PM +0200, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > Hi Rich, > > On Tue, 4 Oct 2016, Rich Felker wrote: > > > On Tue, Oct 04, 2016 at 11:27:22AM -0400, Jeff King wrote: > > > On Tue, Oct 04, 2016 at 11:08:48AM -0400, Rich Felker wrote: > >

Re: Regression: git no longer works with musl libc's regex impl

2016-10-04 Thread Rich Felker
On Tue, Oct 04, 2016 at 11:27:22AM -0400, Jeff King wrote: > On Tue, Oct 04, 2016 at 11:08:48AM -0400, Rich Felker wrote: > > > This commit broke support for using git with musl libc: > > > > https://github.com/git/git/commit/2f8952250a84313b74f96abb7b035874854

Regression: git no longer works with musl libc's regex impl

2016-10-04 Thread Rich Felker
This commit broke support for using git with musl libc: https://github.com/git/git/commit/2f8952250a84313b74f96abb7b035874854cf202 Rather than depending on non-portable GNU regex extensions, there is a simple portable fix for the issue this code was added to work around: When a text file is