kara,
On Tue, Mar 17, 2015, at 17:05, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> If you check the output from
>
> git diff 30a52c1d^ 30a52c1d
>
> and find it appropriately address the problem you originally had,
> that would be wonderful, and if you can suggest further improvement,
> that is equally good.
Ind
On Tue, Mar 17, 2015, at 16:49, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> With more recent versions of Git, namely, the versions after
> 30a52c1d (Merge branch 'ms/submodule-update-config-doc' into maint,
> 2015-03-13), the documentation pages already have updated
> descriptions around this area.
sigh.
That's what
On Tue, Mar 17, 2015, at 15:50, Jeff King wrote:
> Yeah, spelling out the security model more explicitly would be good.
Please see the attached patch.
Cheers
0001-docs-clarify-command-submodule-update-policy.patch
Description: Binary data
karaj,
'man git-submodule' contains mention (in one place) that:
Setting the key submodule.$name.update to !command
will cause command to be run.
This is not documented in 'man gitmodules' (which documents the other
possible values for the 'update' key) nor in 'man git-config' which also
4 matches
Mail list logo
