Re: [musl] Re: Git 2.14.1: t6500: error during test on musl libc

* Junio C Hamano [2017-09-17 09:36:26 +0900]: > versions was in v1.8.5, it seems. IOW, nobody tried to run Git with > musl C in the past 4 years and you are the first one to notice? git works fine on musl in practice, i use it for more than 4years now.

Re: [musl] Re: Test failures when Git is built with libpcre and grep is built without it

* A. Wilcox [2017-01-10 04:36:50 -0600]: > On 09/01/17 15:33, Jeff King wrote: > > The problem is that we are expecting the regex "\x{2b}" to complain > > in regcomp() (as an ERE), but it doesn't. And that probably _is_ > > related to musl, which is providing the libc

Re: [musl] Re: Regression: git no longer works with musl libc's regex impl

* Johannes Schindelin [2016-10-05 13:17:49 +0200]: > I had a brief look at the source code (you use backtracking... hopefully > nobody uses musl to parse regular expressions from untrusted, or > inexperienced, sources [*1*]), and it seems that the regex code might