Re: [PATCH] index-pack: reduce memory footprint a bit

On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 12:49 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote: > matthew sporleder writes: > >> I'm having trouble getting this new patch to apply. > > Apply the first one, replace all object_entry_extra with > object_stat, replace all objects_extra with obj_stat and amend th

Re: [PATCH] index-pack: reduce memory footprint a bit

may lead to incorrect > behavior when the struct is not packed, which is not the case in > index-pack. > > A note about ofs_deltas allocation. We could use ref_deltas memory > allocation strategy for ofs_deltas. But that probably just adds more > overhead on top. ofs-deltas are g

Re: low memory system to clone larger repo

Jan 8, 2015 at 11:10 PM, matthew sporleder > wrote: >> I am attempting to clone this repo: https://github.com/jsonn/src/ > > This repo has 3.4M objects. Basic book keeping would cost 200MB (in > practice it'll be higher because I'm assuming no deltas in my > calcu

low memory system to clone larger repo

I am attempting to clone this repo: https://github.com/jsonn/src/ and have been successful on some lower memory systems, but i'm interested in continuing to push down the limit. I am getting more success running clone via https:// than git:// or ssh (which is confusing to me) and the smallest sys