... in addition to my previous reply, looking at more context:
>> --- a/wt-status.c
>> +++ b/wt-status.c
>> @@ -1319,6 +1319,13 @@ static int grab_1st_switch(unsigned char *osha1,
>> unsigned char *nsha1,
>> hashcpy(cb->nsha1, nsha1);
>> for (end = target; *end && *end != '\n';
Michael J Gruber writes:
> ... in addition to my previous reply, looking at more context:
>
>>> --- a/wt-status.c
>>> +++ b/wt-status.c
>>> @@ -1319,6 +1319,13 @@ static int grab_1st_switch(unsigned char *osha1,
>>> unsigned char *nsha1,
>>> hashcpy(cb->nsha1,
Matthieu Moy venit, vidit, dixit 18.09.2015 21:09:
> Stefan Beller writes:
>
>> On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 10:23 AM, Matthieu Moy
>> wrote:
>>> Jacob Keller writes:
>>>
On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 9:59 AM, Matthieu Moy
Matthieu Moy writes:
> I investigated a bit more. The root of the problem is "git checkout
> --detach" and the reflog. Here's a reproduction script:
> ...
> If one replaces "git checkout --detach" with "git checkout HEAD^0", then
> the output is the one I expected:
Stefan Beller writes:
> On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 10:23 AM, Matthieu Moy
> wrote:
>> Jacob Keller writes:
>>
>>> On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 9:59 AM, Matthieu Moy
>>> wrote:
I'm getting it
Hi,
I did a "git checkout --detached", and now I get:
$ git status
HEAD detached at HEAD
nothing to commit, working directory clean
$ git branch
* (HEAD detached at HEAD)
master
The "HEAD detached at HEAD" is not very helpful. I thought there was an
abbreved sha1 here before, but
On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 9:59 AM, Matthieu Moy
wrote:
> I'm getting it even if there's a tag and/or a branch pointing to the
> same commit.
>
> Any idea what's going on?
>
Any chance you accidentally made a branch or tag named HEAD?
Regards,
Jake
--
To unsubscribe
Jacob Keller writes:
> On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 9:59 AM, Matthieu Moy
> wrote:
>> I'm getting it even if there's a tag and/or a branch pointing to the
>> same commit.
>>
>> Any idea what's going on?
>
> Any chance you accidentally made a
On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 10:23 AM, Matthieu Moy
wrote:
> Jacob Keller writes:
>
>> On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 9:59 AM, Matthieu Moy
>> wrote:
>>> I'm getting it even if there's a tag and/or a branch pointing to the
9 matches
Mail list logo