Hi,
On Thu, 18 Aug 2005, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Johannes Schindelin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >> The patch is for people who thinks the user who uses the "--all"
> >> flag deserves the danger that comes with the convenience.
> >>
> >> Comments?
> >
> > This is a sane default behaviour. M
Johannes Schindelin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> The patch is for people who thinks the user who uses the "--all"
>> flag deserves the danger that comes with the convenience.
>>
>> Comments?
>
> This is a sane default behaviour. Maybe introduce yet another flag
> "--no-remove", which says that
Hi,
On Thu, 18 Aug 2005, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> After you deleted files from your working tree, automatic
> git-update-cache used when the "--all" flag is given to "git
> commit" barfs because it lacks the --remove flag.
>
> It can be argued that this is a feature; people should be
> careful an
After you deleted files from your working tree, automatic
git-update-cache used when the "--all" flag is given to "git
commit" barfs because it lacks the --remove flag.
It can be argued that this is a feature; people should be
careful and something with a grave consequence like removing
files shou
4 matches
Mail list logo