Jeff King writes:
> But I would think for that particular use case, you would not want to do
> a per-glob prefix for that, but would rather use a command-line switch.
Yes.
Even though it is not listed as possible future semantics, one thing
that we may want to have before all others is ":(negat
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 02:38:08PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> > Thanks, that helped. I got excited when I saw the "icase" in the
> > comments and thought it might already be implemented. But it looks like
> > it is still to be done. :)
>
> Yeah, some are tongue-in-cheek (e.g. I do not know wh
Jeff King writes:
> On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 01:30:03PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
>> Jeff King writes:
>>
>> > If the proposal were instead to add a certain type of pathspec that is
>> > case-insensitive[2], that would make much more sense to me. It is not
>> > violating git's case-sensitiv
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 01:30:03PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Jeff King writes:
>
> > If the proposal were instead to add a certain type of pathspec that is
> > case-insensitive[2], that would make much more sense to me. It is not
> > violating git's case-sensitivity because it is purely a _
Jeff King writes:
> If the proposal were instead to add a certain type of pathspec that is
> case-insensitive[2], that would make much more sense to me. It is not
> violating git's case-sensitivity because it is purely a _query_ issue.
> And it is a feature you might use whether or not your files
On Sun, Sep 09, 2012 at 12:24:58PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Having said all that, I am not sure if the "fixing" is really the
> right approach to begin with. Contrast these two:
>
> $ git blame MakeFILE
> $ git blame HEAD -- MakeFILE
>
> The latter, regardless of core.ignorecase,
On Sun, Sep 9, 2012 at 9:24 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Ralf Thielow writes:
>
>> If "core.ignorecase" is true, "git blame" fails
>> when the given path differs to the real path in case
>> sensitivity.
>
> It is rather hard to respond to this request for comment because you
> are describing the b
Junio C Hamano writes:
> If we were to do anything, I would think the most sane thing to do
> is a smaller patch to fix fake_working_tree_commit() where it calls
> lstat() and _should_ die with "Cannot lstat MakeFILE" on a sane
> filesystem. It does not currently make sure the path exists in the
Ralf Thielow writes:
> If "core.ignorecase" is true, "git blame" fails
> when the given path differs to the real path in case
> sensitivity.
It is rather hard to respond to this request for comment because you
are describing the behaviour you perceive as a problem only fuzzily
(i.e. "fails"---wh
Am 09.09.2012 19:01, schrieb Ralf Thielow:
> If "core.ignorecase" is true, "git blame" fails
> when the given path differs to the real path in case
> sensitivity.
...
> + dir = opendir(res.buf);
...
> + struct dirent *ent = readdir(dir
If "core.ignorecase" is true, "git blame" fails
when the given path differs to the real path in case
sensitivity.
Signed-off-by: Ralf Thielow
---
.gitignore | 1 +
Makefile | 3 +++
builtin/blame.c| 58 ++
test-p
11 matches
Mail list logo
