Re: [PATCH] Change git-branch to list branches

Junio C Hamano [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I do not think we have agreed to limit ourselves to a flat namespace under refs/heads without subdirectories. Something like what git-show-branches-script does when $# == 0, perhaps? I didn't realise this. I'll send a revised patch soon. -- Kalle

[PATCH] Change git-branch to list branches

If no argument provided to `git branch`, show available branches and mark current branch with star. This is based on patch written by Amos Waterland [EMAIL PROTECTED]. Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- git-branch-script |8 +++- 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 1

Re: [PATCH] Change git-branch to list branches

Kalle Valo [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: If no argument provided to `git branch`, show available branches and mark current branch with star. I like the general direction, but this particular implementation may be a bit troublesome. +if [ -z $branchname ]; then +current=$(basename $(readlink