Jeff King writes:
> On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 12:27:52AM -0700, Jacob Keller wrote:
>
>> > For the sneaker-net case, you are much better off generating a single
>> > pack and then using "split" and "cat" to reconstruct it on the other end
>> > Not that I think we should go into such
On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 12:27:52AM -0700, Jacob Keller wrote:
> > For the sneaker-net case, you are much better off generating a single
> > pack and then using "split" and "cat" to reconstruct it on the other end
> > Not that I think we should go into such detail in the manpage, but I
> > have to
On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 2:22 PM, Jeff King wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 12:56:25PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
>> - There should be an update to say max-pack-size is not something
>>normal users would ever want.
>
> Agreed.
>
>> diff --git
On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 12:56:25PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> - There should be an update to say max-pack-size is not something
>normal users would ever want.
Agreed.
> diff --git a/Documentation/git-pack-objects.txt
> b/Documentation/git-pack-objects.txt
> index
Jonathan Tan writes:
> The documentation for pack-objects describes that it creates "a packed
> archive of objects", which is confusing because it may create multiple
> packs if --max-pack-size is set. Update the documentation to clarify
> this.
>
> Signed-off-by:
The documentation for pack-objects describes that it creates "a packed
archive of objects", which is confusing because it may create multiple
packs if --max-pack-size is set. Update the documentation to clarify
this.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Tan
---
It took me quite some
6 matches
Mail list logo