On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 3:06 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Junio C Hamano writes:
> + die(_("sorry, cannot apply a 'copying' patch in
> reverse (yet)"));
Is it wise to give the reader of the output hope that this is not
implemented (yet)
but may be in the future?
I'd drop th
Junio C Hamano writes:
> Action item: warn users against using "apply -R" on a
> patchset with such a patch while this is fixed.
This needs to be replaced with the logic to properly reverse a patch
that creates a new file by copying from somewhere else, but for now,
this would be
2 matches
Mail list logo
