On 15.10.13 02:12, Jeff King wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 13, 2013 at 10:00:12PM +0200, Torsten Bögershausen wrote:
>
>> On 05.10.13 21:48, Torsten Bögershausen wrote:
>>> On 2013-10-03 03.31, Jeff King wrote:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/235473
>> What do we think a
On Sun, Oct 13, 2013 at 10:00:12PM +0200, Torsten Bögershausen wrote:
> On 05.10.13 21:48, Torsten Bögershausen wrote:
> > On 2013-10-03 03.31, Jeff King wrote:
> >>
> >> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/235473
> What do we think about extending the test a little bit:
I n
On 05.10.13 21:48, Torsten Bögershausen wrote:
> On 2013-10-03 03.31, Jeff King wrote:
>>
>> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/235473
What do we think about extending the test a little bit:
git diff 771cf1dab9303bab3c8198b8b6 -- t5602-clone-remote-exec.sh
diff --git a/t/
Torsten Bögershausen writes:
> test_expect_success 'cloning myhost:src uses ssh' '
> clear_ssh &&
> - git clone myhost:src ssh-clone &&
> + ! git clone myhost:src ssh-clone &&
This succeeds if Git segfaults for example. Please, use test_must_fail
instead of "!".
--
Matthie
On 2013-10-03 03.31, Jeff King wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 08:01:23AM +0700, Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy wrote:
>
>>> Sorry for the noise, I noticed it when I was trying to construct test cases.
>>>
>>> What do we think about adding this at the end of t5505:
>>
>> As usual more tests are usually bet
On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 08:01:23AM +0700, Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy wrote:
> > Sorry for the noise, I noticed it when I was trying to construct test cases.
> >
> > What do we think about adding this at the end of t5505:
>
> As usual more tests are usually better. But is t5505-remote.sh the
> best plac
On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 1:40 AM, Torsten Bögershausen wrote:
> On 2013-09-29 02.33, Duy Nguyen wrote:
>> On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 2:37 AM, Torsten Bögershausen wrote:
>>> "git clone /foo/bar:baz" or "git clone ../foo/bar:baz"
>>> are meant to clone from the local file system, and not to clone
>>> f
On 2013-09-29 02.33, Duy Nguyen wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 2:37 AM, Torsten Bögershausen wrote:
>> "git clone /foo/bar:baz" or "git clone ../foo/bar:baz"
>> are meant to clone from the local file system, and not to clone
>> from a remote server over git-over-ssh.
>
> I don't think this is n
On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 2:37 AM, Torsten Bögershausen wrote:
> "git clone /foo/bar:baz" or "git clone ../foo/bar:baz"
> are meant to clone from the local file system, and not to clone
> from a remote server over git-over-ssh.
I don't think this is necessary. Commit 6000334 should detect both
case
"git clone /foo/bar:baz" or "git clone ../foo/bar:baz"
are meant to clone from the local file system, and not to clone
from a remote server over git-over-ssh.
Signed-off-by: Torsten Bögershausen
---
connect.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/connect.c b/conne
10 matches
Mail list logo