On Thu, Jun 08, 2017 at 04:11:52PM +0900, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > It probably doesn't matter that much, though, as you'd really want to
> > `repack -f` afterwards if you care about getting good deltas. And one
> > base object every 50 versions is probably fine for keeping the initial
> > pack
On Thu, Jun 08, 2017 at 03:05:37AM -0400, Jeff King wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 08, 2017 at 02:34:36PM +0900, Mike Hommey wrote:
>
> > In 618e613a70, 10 years ago, the default for pack depth used for
> > git-pack-objects and git-repack was changed from 10 to 50, while
> > leaving fast-import's default
On Thu, Jun 08, 2017 at 02:34:36PM +0900, Mike Hommey wrote:
> In 618e613a70, 10 years ago, the default for pack depth used for
> git-pack-objects and git-repack was changed from 10 to 50, while
> leaving fast-import's default to 10.
>
> There doesn't seem to be a reason besides oversight for
In 618e613a70, 10 years ago, the default for pack depth used for
git-pack-objects and git-repack was changed from 10 to 50, while
leaving fast-import's default to 10.
There doesn't seem to be a reason besides oversight for the change not
having happened in fast-import as well.
Interestingly,
4 matches
Mail list logo
