On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 9:55 PM, Ramkumar Ramachandra
wrote:
> You can now do something like
>
> $ git for-each-ref --format='%C(red)%(refname:short)%C(reset)
> %C(blue)%(upstream:diff)%C(reset)' --count 5 --sort='-committerdate'
> refs/heads
>
> To get output that's much more customizable 'git br
Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Doesn't Duy's more recent work on the pretty-format front introduce
> alignment operators?
Oh, awesome. I know where to steal that from now ;)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More major
Ramkumar Ramachandra writes:
> I just have one major doubt: in the above output, how do I align all
> the upstream branches to the same column? How can I achieve it with
> pretty-formats? Something like %*d? But * is already taken to mean
> deref in for-each-ref's --format.
Doesn't Duy's
You can now do something like
$ git for-each-ref --format='%C(red)%(refname:short)%C(reset)
%C(blue)%(upstream:diff)%C(reset)' --count 5 --sort='-committerdate'
refs/heads
To get output that's much more customizable 'git branch' output. Future
patches will attempt unify the semantics of 'git bra
4 matches
Mail list logo