On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 04:09:56PM +, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
Change the display of hunks in hunk splitting mode to preserve the diff
heading, which hasn't been done ever since the hunk splitting was
initially added in v1.4.4.2-270-g835b2ae.
Splitting the first hunk of this patch
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 8:39 PM, Jeff King p...@peff.net wrote:
On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 04:09:56PM +, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
Change the display of hunks in hunk splitting mode to preserve the diff
heading, which hasn't been done ever since the hunk splitting was
initially added in
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 09:42:56PM +0200, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
Good suggestion, but tricky as you point out. Another thing I've
wanted many times is to make it smart enough that when you edit code
like:
A()
B();
And change it to:
X();
Y();
The change from A-X
Jeff King p...@peff.net writes:
One, there is a slightly funny artifact in that the hunk header comes
from the top of the context line, and that top is a different position
for each of the split hunks. So in a file like:
header_A
content
header_B
one
two
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 02:07:15PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
And figuring out B here
would be prohibitively difficult, I would think, as it would require
applying the funcname rules internal to git-diff to a hunk that git-diff
itself never actually sees.
You can actually apply a
Change the display of hunks in hunk splitting mode to preserve the diff
heading, which hasn't been done ever since the hunk splitting was
initially added in v1.4.4.2-270-g835b2ae.
Splitting the first hunk of this patch will now result in:
Stage this hunk [y,n,q,a,d,/,j,J,g,s,e,?]? s
Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason ava...@gmail.com writes:
Change the display of hunks in hunk splitting mode to preserve the diff
heading, which hasn't been done ever since the hunk splitting was
initially added in v1.4.4.2-270-g835b2ae.
Splitting the first hunk of this patch will now result in:
7 matches
Mail list logo
