Luke Diamand writes:
> Yes. The test passes with your change.
>>
>> IOW, can we have a follow up to this patch that fixes a known
>> breakage the patch documents ;-)?
>
> Yes.
Thanks.
On 27 March 2017 at 00:18, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Luke Diamand writes:
>
>> As per the discussion about use of "git name-rev" vs "git symbolic-ref" in
>> git-p4 here:
>>
>> http://marc.info/?l=git&m=148979063421355
>>
>> git-p4 could get confused about the branch it is on and affects
>> the git-
Luke Diamand writes:
> As per the discussion about use of "git name-rev" vs "git symbolic-ref" in
> git-p4 here:
>
> http://marc.info/?l=git&m=148979063421355
>
> git-p4 could get confused about the branch it is on and affects
> the git-p4.allowSubmit option. This adds a failing
> test case for
As per the discussion about use of "git name-rev" vs "git symbolic-ref" in
git-p4 here:
http://marc.info/?l=git&m=148979063421355
git-p4 could get confused about the branch it is on and affects
the git-p4.allowSubmit option. This adds a failing
test case for the problem.
Luke Diamand (1):
git
4 matches
Mail list logo