Re: [PATCH] graph.c: visual difference on subsequent series

Junio C Hamano venit, vidit, dixit 03.09.2015 19:13: > Michael J Gruber writes: > >>> Is the design of your independent implementation the same except >>> that 'o' is used instead of 'x'? Independent implementation does >>> not make the same design magically better,

Re: [PATCH] graph.c: visual difference on subsequent series

Michael J Gruber writes: > How would it? "--left-right" information is requested specifically and > not overridden. Root information is not requested specifically [by the > user]. If this "highlight root prominently" were a config, then using both config and

Re: [PATCH] graph.c: visual difference on subsequent series

Michael J Gruber writes: >> Is the design of your independent implementation the same except >> that 'o' is used instead of 'x'? Independent implementation does >> not make the same design magically better, if that is the case ;-) > > Interestingly, the patch to the

Re: [PATCH] graph.c: visual difference on subsequent series

Junio C Hamano venit, vidit, dixit 27.07.2015 22:17: > Antoine Beaupré writes: > >> Any reason why this patch wasn't included / reviewed? >> ... >>> This patch is similar than the one provided by Milton Soares Filho in >>>

Re: [PATCH] graph.c: visual difference on subsequent series

Any reason why this patch wasn't included / reviewed? Thanks, A. On 2014-11-10 08:33:32, Antoine Beaupré wrote: For projects with separate history lines and, thus, multiple root-commits, the linear arrangement of `git log --graph --oneline` does not allow the user to spot where the sequence

Re: [PATCH] graph.c: visual difference on subsequent series

Antoine Beaupré anar...@koumbit.org writes: Any reason why this patch wasn't included / reviewed? ... This patch is similar than the one provided by Milton Soares Filho in 1382734287.31768.1.git.send.email.milton.soares.fi...@gmail.com but was implemented independently and uses the 'o'

[PATCH] graph.c: visual difference on subsequent series

For projects with separate history lines and, thus, multiple root-commits, the linear arrangement of `git log --graph --oneline` does not allow the user to spot where the sequence ends, giving the impression that it's a contiguous history. E.g. History sequence A: a1 -- a2 -- a3 (root-commit)

Re: [PATCH] graph.c: visual difference on subsequent series

[administrivia: please avoid culling addresses from To:/Cc: lines] Keshav Kini keshav.k...@gmail.com writes: What about just putting an extra blank line after every root commit line (possibly except the last one)? That should make it plenty easy to see where the root commits are in --oneline

Re: [PATCH] graph.c: visual difference on subsequent series

Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com writes: [administrivia: please avoid culling addresses from To:/Cc: lines] Yikes, sorry about that. I've been sending messages through Gmane rather than via email, and I didn't realize the list didn't automatically send messages to the appropriate people who are

Re: [PATCH] graph.c: visual difference on subsequent series

On 28 October 2013 13:41, Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com wrote: I agree to all of the above, including the ugliness of 'x' ;-) A blank may however be hard to spot, if the range is limited, though. For example, A 'x' looks like termination points in some specification languages such as SDL

Re: [PATCH] graph.c: visual difference on subsequent series

Milton Soares Filho milton.soares.fi...@gmail.com writes: On 28 October 2013 13:41, Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com wrote: I agree to all of the above, including the ugliness of 'x' ;-) A blank may however be hard to spot, if the range is limited, though. For example, A 'x' looks like

[PATCH] graph.c: visual difference on subsequent series

For projects with separate history lines and, thus, multiple root-commits, the linear arrangement of `git log --graph --oneline` does not allow the user to spot where the sequence ends, giving the impression that it's a contiguous history. E.g. History sequence A: a1 -- a2 -- a3 (root-commit)

Re: [PATCH] graph.c: visual difference on subsequent series

Milton Soares Filho milton.soares.fi...@gmail.com writes: git log --graph --oneline * a1 * a2 x a3 * b1 * b2 x b3 I agree that the problem you are trying to solve is a good thing to tackle, and I also agree that marking a root commit differently from other

Re: [PATCH] graph.c: visual difference on subsequent series

On 25 October 2013 15:13, Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com wrote: Milton Soares Filho milton.soares.fi...@gmail.com writes: git log --graph --oneline * a1 * a2 x a3 * b1 * b2 x b3 I agree that the problem you are trying to solve is a good thing to tackle,

[PATCH] graph.c: visual difference on subsequent series

For projects with separate history lines and, thus, multiple root-commits, the linear arrangement of `git log --graph --oneline` does not allow the user to spot where the sequence ends, giving the impression that it's a contiguous history. E.g. History sequence A: a1 -- a2 -- a3 (root-commit)

Re: [PATCH] graph.c: visual difference on subsequent series

Milton Soares Filho milton.soares.fi...@gmail.com writes: On 25 October 2013 15:13, Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com wrote: Milton Soares Filho milton.soares.fi...@gmail.com writes: git log --graph --oneline * a1 * a2 x a3 * b1 * b2 x b3 I agree that the