Duy Nguyen pclo...@gmail.com writes:
I keep tripping over this real_type vs type in this code. What do
you think about renaming type field to in_pack_type and
real_type to canon_type (or final_type)? Real does not really
say anything in this context..
An unqualified name type does bother me
On Tue, Jul 07, 2015 at 08:49:19AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Duy Nguyen pclo...@gmail.com writes:
I keep tripping over this real_type vs type in this code. What do
you think about renaming type field to in_pack_type and
real_type to canon_type (or final_type)? Real does not really
Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com writes:
When c6458e60 (index-pack: kill union delta_base to save memory,
2015-04-18) attempted to reduce the memory footprint of index-pack,
one of the key thing it did was to keep track of ref-deltas and
ofs-deltas separately.
In fix_unresolved_deltas(),
On Sun, Jul 5, 2015 at 5:30 AM, Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com wrote:
When c6458e60 (index-pack: kill union delta_base to save memory,
2015-04-18) attempted to reduce the memory footprint of index-pack,
one of the key thing it did was to keep track of ref-deltas and
ofs-deltas separately.
When c6458e60 (index-pack: kill union delta_base to save memory,
2015-04-18) attempted to reduce the memory footprint of index-pack,
one of the key thing it did was to keep track of ref-deltas and
ofs-deltas separately.
In fix_unresolved_deltas(), however it forgot that it now wants to
look only
5 matches
Mail list logo
