On 09/12, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> Hi Thomas,
>
> [quickly, as I will go back to a proper vacation after this]
Sorry about interrupting your vacation, enjoy wherever you are! :)
> On Wed, 12 Sep 2018, Thomas Gummerer wrote:
>
> > diff --git a/linear-assignment.c b/linear-assignment.c
> >
On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 3:01 PM Thomas Gummerer wrote:
> Subject: [PATCH] linear-assignment: fix potential out of bounds memory access
>
> Currently the 'compute_assignment()' function can may read memory out
"can may"?
> of bounds, even if used correctly. Namely thi
Hi Thomas,
[quickly, as I will go back to a proper vacation after this]
On Wed, 12 Sep 2018, Thomas Gummerer wrote:
> diff --git a/linear-assignment.c b/linear-assignment.c
> index 9b3e56e283..7700b80eeb 100644
> --- a/linear-assignment.c
> +++ b/linear-assignment.c
> @@ -51,8 +51,8 @@ void
On 09/12, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Thomas Gummerer writes:
> > --- >8 ---
> >
> > Subject: [PATCH] linear-assignment: fix potential out of bounds memory
> > access
> >
> > Currently the 'compute_assignment()' function can may read memory out
>
close as possible to the original is probably
> our best option here, also for future readers of this code.
Thanks for digging.
> --- >8 ---
>
> Subject: [PATCH] linear-assignment: fix potential out of bounds memory access
>
> Currently the 'compute_assignment()' function can ma
t; I'm looking into why that fails. Also adding Dscho to Cc here as the
> > author of this code.
>
> The diff below seems to fix it. Not submitting this as a proper
> patch [...]
I found the time to actually have a look at the paper, so here's a
proper patch:
I'm still not entirely
6 matches
Mail list logo
