Johannes Schindelin writes:
> ... there is a different problem here: you stated very explicitly
> that it is okay for `pu` to be broken [*1*]. If it were different, if any
> breakage would imply that a fix is really, really required lest the patch
> series be evicted from `pu`, we could easily mo
Hi Junio,
On Wed, 15 Feb 2017, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Junio C Hamano writes:
>
> > Johannes Schindelin writes:
> >
> >> FWIW I wish it were different, that git.git's `master` reflected more
> >> closely what the current Git for Windows version has.
> >
> > Well, we two wishing the same thing
Johannes Sixt writes:
> Am 16.02.2017 um 18:10 schrieb Johannes Schindelin:
>> On Wed, 15 Feb 2017, Johannes Sixt wrote:
>>> I do not see how dup2() causes a change in stdio state. I
>>> must be missing something (and that may be a basic misunderstanding of how
>>> stdio is initialized).
>>
>> It
Am 16.02.2017 um 18:10 schrieb Johannes Schindelin:
On Wed, 15 Feb 2017, Johannes Sixt wrote:
I do not see how dup2() causes a change in stdio state. I
must be missing something (and that may be a basic misunderstanding of how
stdio is initialized).
It appears that dup2()ing fd 2 resets that s
Hi Hannes,
On Wed, 15 Feb 2017, Johannes Sixt wrote:
> Am 15.02.2017 um 13:32 schrieb Johannes Schindelin:
> > On Tue, 14 Feb 2017, Johannes Sixt wrote:
> > > Am 14.02.2017 um 15:47 schrieb Johannes Schindelin:
> > > > On Mon, 13 Feb 2017, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> > > > > Johannes Schindelin writ
Junio C Hamano writes:
> Johannes Schindelin writes:
>
>> FWIW I wish it were different, that git.git's `master` reflected more
>> closely what the current Git for Windows version has.
>
> Well, we two wishing the same thing together without doing anything
> else would make it happen.
ehh, woul
Johannes Schindelin writes:
> Hi Junio,
> ...
> The hat of a person who sees how patches are reviewed before they enter
> pu/next/master/maint of git.git.
> ...
> make sense. This makes my life harder, but I believe that the alternative
> would be *not* to have those patches in git.git *at all*.
Am 15.02.2017 um 13:32 schrieb Johannes Schindelin:
On Tue, 14 Feb 2017, Johannes Sixt wrote:
Am 14.02.2017 um 15:47 schrieb Johannes Schindelin:
On Mon, 13 Feb 2017, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Johannes Schindelin writes:
What we forgot was to mark stderr as unbuffered again.
I do not see how t
Hi Junio,
On Tue, 14 Feb 2017, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Johannes Schindelin writes:
>
> >> OK. Should this go directly to 'master', as the isatty thing is
> >> already in?
> >
> > From my point of view, it is not crucial. The next Git for Windows
> > version will have it, of course, and Hannes
Hi Hannes,
On Tue, 14 Feb 2017, Johannes Sixt wrote:
> Am 14.02.2017 um 15:47 schrieb Johannes Schindelin:
> > On Mon, 13 Feb 2017, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> > > Johannes Schindelin writes:
> > > > When removing the hack for isatty(), we actually removed more than
> > > > just an isatty() hack: we
Johannes Sixt writes:
> Am 14.02.2017 um 15:47 schrieb Johannes Schindelin:
>
>>>From my point of view, it is not crucial. The next Git for Windows version
>> will have it, of course, and Hannes is always running with his set of
>> patches, he can easily cherry-pick this one, too.
>
> The patch f
Johannes Schindelin writes:
>> OK. Should this go directly to 'master', as the isatty thing is
>> already in?
>
> From my point of view, it is not crucial. The next Git for Windows version
> will have it, of course, and Hannes is always running with his set of
> patches, he can easily cherry-pic
Am 14.02.2017 um 15:47 schrieb Johannes Schindelin:
On Mon, 13 Feb 2017, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Johannes Schindelin writes:
When removing the hack for isatty(), we actually removed more than just
an isatty() hack: we removed the hack where internal data structures of
the MSVC runtime are modifi
Hi Junio,
On Mon, 13 Feb 2017, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Johannes Schindelin writes:
>
> > When removing the hack for isatty(), we actually removed more than just
> > an isatty() hack: we removed the hack where internal data structures of
> > the MSVC runtime are modified in order to redirect std
Johannes Schindelin writes:
> When removing the hack for isatty(), we actually removed more than just
> an isatty() hack: we removed the hack where internal data structures of
> the MSVC runtime are modified in order to redirect stdout/stderr.
>
> Instead of using that hack (that does not work wi
When removing the hack for isatty(), we actually removed more than just
an isatty() hack: we removed the hack where internal data structures of
the MSVC runtime are modified in order to redirect stdout/stderr.
Instead of using that hack (that does not work with newer versions of
the runtime, anywa
16 matches
Mail list logo