Jeff King p...@peff.net writes:
On Fri, Apr 04, 2014 at 03:28:48PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
...
OK, together with the fact that only ancient versions of fetcher
would trigger this do not reuse codepath, I agree that we should
go the simplest route this patch takes.
By the way, we may
On Wed, Apr 02, 2014 at 10:39:13AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
However, it's possible that the other side cannot read our
packfile verbatim. For example, we may have objects stored
as OFS_DELTA, but the client is an antique version of git
that only understands REF_DELTA. We negotiate
Jeff King p...@peff.net writes:
We could convert OFS_DELTA to REF_DELTA on the fly. That _may_ have a
performance impact. Right now, we are basically doing the equivalent of
sendfile(), and conversion would involve iterating through each object
and examining the header. I think that's
On Fri, Apr 04, 2014 at 03:28:48PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Jeff King p...@peff.net writes:
We could convert OFS_DELTA to REF_DELTA on the fly. That _may_ have a
performance impact. Right now, we are basically doing the equivalent of
sendfile(), and conversion would involve iterating
When we are sending a packfile to a remote, we currently try
to reuse a whole chunk of packfile without bothering to look
at the individual objects. This can make things like initial
clones much lighter on the server, as we can just dump the
packfile bytes.
However, it's possible that the other
Jeff King p...@peff.net writes:
When we are sending a packfile to a remote, we currently try
to reuse a whole chunk of packfile without bothering to look
at the individual objects. This can make things like initial
clones much lighter on the server, as we can just dump the
packfile bytes.
6 matches
Mail list logo
