On 17/09/18 17:27, Ramsay Jones wrote:
>
>
> On 17/09/18 15:15, Ben Peart wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 9/16/2018 3:17 AM, Eric Sunshine wrote:
>>> On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 7:29 PM Ramsay Jones
>>> wrote:
At one time, the POSIX standard required the type used to represent
a thread handle
On 17/09/18 15:15, Ben Peart wrote:
>
>
> On 9/16/2018 3:17 AM, Eric Sunshine wrote:
>> On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 7:29 PM Ramsay Jones
>> wrote:
>>> At one time, the POSIX standard required the type used to represent
>>> a thread handle (pthread_t) be an arithmetic type. This is no longer
>>>
On 9/16/2018 3:17 AM, Eric Sunshine wrote:
On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 7:29 PM Ramsay Jones
wrote:
At one time, the POSIX standard required the type used to represent
a thread handle (pthread_t) be an arithmetic type. This is no longer
the case, probably because different platforms used to
On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 7:29 PM Ramsay Jones
wrote:
> At one time, the POSIX standard required the type used to represent
> a thread handle (pthread_t) be an arithmetic type. This is no longer
> the case, probably because different platforms used to regularly
> ignore that requirement. For
At one time, the POSIX standard required the type used to represent
a thread handle (pthread_t) be an arithmetic type. This is no longer
the case, probably because different platforms used to regularly
ignore that requirement. For example, on cygwin a pthread_t is a
pointer to a structure (a
5 matches
Mail list logo