On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 11:02 PM, Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com wrote:
Antoine Pelisse apeli...@gmail.com writes:
Is the untold
and obvious-to-those-who-are-familiar-with-this-codepath assumption
that it is guaranteed that there is at most one */clone/.hg under
shared_path?
No, there is no
Antoine Pelisse apeli...@gmail.com writes:
On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 11:02 PM, Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com wrote:
Antoine Pelisse apeli...@gmail.com writes:
Is the untold
and obvious-to-those-who-are-familiar-with-this-codepath assumption
that it is guaranteed that there is at most one
On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 8:36 AM, Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com wrote:
Antoine Pelisse apeli...@gmail.com writes:
Quoting that part I was asking about again:
+# check and upgrade old organization
+hg_path = os.path.join(shared_path, '.hg')
+if
From: Felipe Contreras felipe.contre...@gmail.com
6796d49 (remote-hg: use a shared repository store) introduced a bug by
making the shared repository '.git/hg', which is already used before
that patch, so clones that happened before that patch, fail after that
patch, because there's no shared
From: Felipe Contreras felipe.contre...@gmail.com
6796d49 (remote-hg: use a shared repository store) introduced a bug by
making the shared repository '.git/hg', which is already used before
that patch, so clones that happened before that patch, fail after that
patch, because there's no shared
On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 2:22 PM, Antoine Pelisse apeli...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Felipe Contreras felipe.contre...@gmail.com
6796d49 (remote-hg: use a shared repository store) introduced a bug by
making the shared repository '.git/hg', which is already used before
that patch, so clones that
On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 9:31 PM, Felipe Contreras
felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 2:22 PM, Antoine Pelisse apeli...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Felipe Contreras felipe.contre...@gmail.com
6796d49 (remote-hg: use a shared repository store) introduced a bug by
making the
7 matches
Mail list logo