Am 15.08.2017 um 02:46 schrieb Jonathan Nieder:
> Hi,
>
> René Scharfe wrote:
>> We already compare changed files with their expected new contents using
>> diff(1), so we don't need to check with "test_must_fail test_cmp" if
>> they differ from their original state. A later patch could convert t
Am 14.08.2017 um 22:16 schrieb René Scharfe:
> sum(1) is a command for calculating checksums of the contents of files.
> It was part of early editions of Unix ("Research Unix", 1972/1973, [1]).
> cksum(1) appeared in 4.4BSD (1993) as a replacement [2], and became part
> of POSIX.1-2008 [3]. OpenBS
Am 15.08.2017 um 02:46 schrieb Jonathan Nieder:
Hi,
René Scharfe wrote:
sum(1) is a command for calculating checksums of the contents of files.
It was part of early editions of Unix ("Research Unix", 1972/1973, [1]).
cksum(1) appeared in 4.4BSD (1993) as a replacement [2], and became part
of P
Hi,
René Scharfe wrote:
> sum(1) is a command for calculating checksums of the contents of files.
> It was part of early editions of Unix ("Research Unix", 1972/1973, [1]).
> cksum(1) appeared in 4.4BSD (1993) as a replacement [2], and became part
> of POSIX.1-2008 [3]. OpenBSD 5.6 (2014) remove
René Scharfe writes:
> It's more convenient because it shows differences nicely, it's faster on
> MinGW because we have a special implementation there based only on
> shell-internal commands,...
This made me wonder why we are not using that "faster" one
everywhere, but it turns out that it depen
sum(1) is a command for calculating checksums of the contents of files.
It was part of early editions of Unix ("Research Unix", 1972/1973, [1]).
cksum(1) appeared in 4.4BSD (1993) as a replacement [2], and became part
of POSIX.1-2008 [3]. OpenBSD 5.6 (2014) removed sum(1).
We only use sum(1) in t
6 matches
Mail list logo
