On 11/25/2014 11:56 PM, Stefan Beller wrote:
From: Ronnie Sahlberg
Signed-off-by: Ronnie Sahlberg
Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller
---
This was also part of the ongoing series from Ronnie.
But I think the patch in this form is rather independant,
documenting the current state of "git br
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 4:35 PM, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Stefan Beller wrote:
>
>> This was also part of the ongoing series from Ronnie.
>> But I think the patch in this form is rather independant,
>> documenting the current state of "git branch -d", so it's
>> fine to have it in now.
>
>
Hi,
Stefan Beller wrote:
> This was also part of the ongoing series from Ronnie.
> But I think the patch in this form is rather independant,
> documenting the current state of "git branch -d", so it's
> fine to have it in now.
Is there a patch adding the feature this patch describes that this
co
From: Ronnie Sahlberg
Signed-off-by: Ronnie Sahlberg
Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller
---
This was also part of the ongoing series from Ronnie.
But I think the patch in this form is rather independant,
documenting the current state of "git branch -d", so it's
fine to have it in now.
t/t14
4 matches
Mail list logo