Re: [PATCH 0/2] Getopt::Long workaround in send-email

2015-02-16 Thread Tom G. Christensen
On 13/02/15 21:19, Junio C Hamano wrote: I am inclined to squash these into one commit before starting to merge them down to 'next' and then to 'master', after getting Tested-by: from those with older Getopt::Long (prior to 2.32). Junio C Hamano (1): SQUASH??? t9001: turn --no$option

Re: [PATCH 0/2] Getopt::Long workaround in send-email

2015-02-14 Thread Brandon Casey
[apparently it is impossible to send a plain text email using Google Inbox, maybe people on this list know someone to talk to about that? Sorry for the dup for those on cc] On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 12:19 PM, Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com wrote: The first one is a replay of Kyle's workaround

Re: [PATCH 0/2] Getopt::Long workaround in send-email

2015-02-13 Thread Kyle J. McKay
On Feb 13, 2015, at 12:19, Junio C Hamano wrote: The first one is a replay of Kyle's workaround for older versions of Getopt::Long that did not take --no-option to negate a boolean option --option. The second one reverts the workarounds made to the test script over time, and should break if the

[PATCH 0/2] Getopt::Long workaround in send-email

2015-02-13 Thread Junio C Hamano
The first one is a replay of Kyle's workaround for older versions of Getopt::Long that did not take --no-option to negate a boolean option --option. The second one revert the workarounds made to the test script over time, and should break if the first one does not work well for older Getopt::Long

Re: [PATCH 0/2] Getopt::Long workaround in send-email

2015-02-13 Thread brian m. carlson
On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 12:19:27PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote: The first one is a replay of Kyle's workaround for older versions of Getopt::Long that did not take --no-option to negate a boolean option --option. The second one revert the workarounds made to the test script over time, and